Nishimura R A, Rihal C S, Tajik A J, Holmes D R
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jul;24(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90556-8.
This study compared the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography with that of conventional cardiac catheterization in the measurement of transmitral gradients in patients with mitral stenosis.
Simultaneous measurement of left atrial and left ventricular pressures is the most accurate method for determination of the mean mitral valve gradient in patients with mitral stenosis. Because of the inherent risks of transseptal catheterization, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure has been used in many invasive laboratories for determination of the mean mitral valve gradient. Recent studies have observed significant errors when pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was used for these measurements. Doppler echocardiography provides a noninvasive alternative for measurement of the transmitral gradient, but its relative accuracy has remained unclear.
Seventeen patients with mitral stenosis who underwent transseptal cardiac catheterization had simultaneous measurement of 1) transmitral gradient by direct left atrial and left ventricular pressures, 2) transmitral gradient by pulmonary capillary wedge and left ventricular pressures, and 3) transmitral gradient by Doppler echocardiography.
Transmitral gradient measured by pulmonary capillary wedge and left ventricular pressures significantly overestimated the gradient obtained by direct measurement of left atrial pressure, with a mean (+/- SD) difference of 3.3 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (or 53%). Correcting the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure for the phase shift resulted in better correlation, but a consistent overestimation still remained, with a mean difference of 2.5 +/- 2.9 mm Hg (or 43%). The best correlation with the smallest variability was comparison of the Doppler-derived mean gradient with the gradient from direct measurement of left atrial and left ventricular pressures, with a mean difference of 0.2 +/- 1.2 mm Hg.
Compared with the transmitral gradient obtained by direct measurement of left atrial and left ventricular pressures, the Doppler-derived gradient is more accurate than that obtained by conventional cardiac catheterization and should be considered the reference standard.
本研究比较了多普勒超声心动图与传统心导管检查在测量二尖瓣狭窄患者跨二尖瓣压差方面的准确性。
同时测量左心房和左心室压力是确定二尖瓣狭窄患者平均二尖瓣压差的最准确方法。由于经房间隔导管插入术存在固有风险,许多侵入性实验室已使用肺毛细血管楔压来确定平均二尖瓣压差。最近的研究发现,使用肺毛细血管楔压进行这些测量时存在显著误差。多普勒超声心动图为测量跨二尖瓣压差提供了一种非侵入性替代方法,但其相对准确性仍不明确。
17例接受经房间隔心导管检查的二尖瓣狭窄患者同时进行了以下测量:1)通过直接测量左心房和左心室压力获得跨二尖瓣压差;2)通过肺毛细血管楔压和左心室压力获得跨二尖瓣压差;3)通过多普勒超声心动图获得跨二尖瓣压差。
通过肺毛细血管楔压和左心室压力测量的跨二尖瓣压差显著高估了直接测量左心房压力所获得的压差,平均(±标准差)差值为3.3±3.5 mmHg(或53%)。对肺毛细血管楔压进行相移校正后相关性有所改善,但仍存在持续高估,平均差值为2.5±2.9 mmHg(或43%)。与最小变异性的最佳相关性是将多普勒得出的平均压差与直接测量左心房和左心室压力得出的压差进行比较,平均差值为0.2±1.2 mmHg。
与直接测量左心房和左心室压力获得的跨二尖瓣压差相比,多普勒得出的压差比传统心导管检查获得的压差更准确,应被视为参考标准。