Tei C, Kisanuki A, Arima S, Arikawa K, Otsuji Y, Natsugoe K, Tanaka H
J Cardiogr. 1985 Dec;15(4):1097-107.
To determine the accuracy and reliability of measurements of mitral flow velocity and pressure gradients obtained from continuous wave Doppler (CWD) echocardiography, the left ventricular pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and CWD echo were simultaneously recorded simultaneously for 22 patients with mitral stenosis. An ultrasonic transducer was placed over the left ventricular apex to direct the ultrasonic beam parallel with the mitral flow. High-pitched audio signals were used to determine whether the ultrasonic beam direction was appropriate. The angle formed by the beam direction and the blood flow was assumed to be zero when a good Doppler echo was recorded. The maximum flow velocity and pressure gradients calculated from CWD echo were compared with pressure gradients obtained by catheterization. These were analyzed during the same heart beats. The results were as follows: Good recordings of pressures and CWD echograms were obtained for 17 patients, and their data were used for the analysis. The maximum flow velocity through the mitral valve obtained by CWD echography was very similar to the pressure gradients obtained by catheterization in terms of phases and patterns. The pressure gradients (x) calculated from CWD using a simplified Bernoulli's equation correlated well with those (y) measured at the same time on pressure tracings (y = 1.2x + 1.5, r = 0.92, p less than 0.001). Mean diastolic pressure gradients (X) obtained by CWD echography also correlated well with those (Y) recorded at catheterization (Y = 1.2X + 0.15, r = 0.95). Based on these results, we conclude that CWD echography is a reliable, noninvasive method to measure the pressure gradient across the mitral valve in patients with mitral stenosis.
为了确定连续波多普勒(CWD)超声心动图所测二尖瓣血流速度和压力阶差的准确性和可靠性,对22例二尖瓣狭窄患者同时记录左心室压力、肺毛细血管楔压和CWD回声。将超声换能器置于左心室心尖上方,使超声束与二尖瓣血流平行。使用高音音频信号来确定超声束方向是否合适。当记录到良好的多普勒回声时,假定束方向与血流形成的角度为零。将CWD回声计算得到的最大流速和压力阶差与导管检查获得的压力阶差进行比较。在同一心动周期内对这些数据进行分析。结果如下:17例患者获得了良好的压力记录和CWD超声心动图,其数据用于分析。CWD超声心动图测得的二尖瓣最大流速在相位和形态上与导管检查获得的压力阶差非常相似。使用简化伯努利方程从CWD计算得到的压力阶差(x)与同时在压力曲线上测得的压力阶差(y)相关性良好(y = 1.2x + 1.5,r = 0.92,p<0.001)。CWD超声心动图获得的平均舒张期压力阶差(X)与导管检查记录的压力阶差(Y)也具有良好的相关性(Y = 1.2X + 0.15,r = 0.95)。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,CWD超声心动图是一种可靠的、非侵入性的方法,可用于测量二尖瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣跨瓣压力阶差。