Vermilyea S G, Prasanna M K, Agar J R
Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 May;71(5):447-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90181-3.
This study examined porcelain labial margins after ultrasonic scaling and air polishing. Thirty metal coupons were covered with 1.5 mm thick shoulder porcelain and cemented to acrylic resin blocks. A reference mark divided each specimen into a "treated" and an "untreated" side. The specimens were treated as three groups with: (1) an air polisher; (2) an ultrasonic scaler, and (3) the ultrasonic scaler and the air polisher. Surface roughness was determined and selected specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope. Surface roughness ranged from 0.37 microns to 1.06 microns for the untreated sides and from 0.86 microns to 2.80 microns for the treated sides. Increases in roughness were 69% for the ultrasonic scaler/air-polisher; 127% for the air polisher, and 162% for the ultrasonic scaler. ANOVA indicated a significant difference between the treatments. Specimens treated with the air polisher or the ultrasonic scaler and air polisher combination were less distorted than those treated with the ultrasonic scaler alone. The data suggested that careless use of an ultrasonic scaler or air polisher could substantially alter porcelain facial margins.
本研究检测了超声洁治和喷砂抛光后瓷唇面边缘的情况。30个金属试片覆盖1.5毫米厚的肩台瓷,并粘结到丙烯酸树脂块上。一条参考标记将每个试件分为“处理”侧和“未处理”侧。试件分为三组进行处理:(1)喷砂抛光器;(2)超声洁治器;(3)超声洁治器和喷砂抛光器。测定表面粗糙度,并在扫描电子显微镜下观察选定的试件。未处理侧的表面粗糙度范围为0.37微米至1.06微米,处理侧为0.86微米至2.80微米。超声洁治器/喷砂抛光器组合使粗糙度增加69%;喷砂抛光器使粗糙度增加127%;超声洁治器使粗糙度增加162%。方差分析表明各处理组之间存在显著差异。使用喷砂抛光器或超声洁治器与喷砂抛光器组合处理的试件比仅用超声洁治器处理的试件变形更小。数据表明,粗心使用超声洁治器或喷砂抛光器会显著改变瓷唇面边缘。