Bang N, Vejborg I M, Lollike K, Nissen N I, Pedersen K L
Medicinsk haematologisk afdeling L, Rigshospitalet, København.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 May 2;156(18):2741-3.
The diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound and lymphography was compared in the staging of 88 consecutive patients with malignant lymphoma, examined during the period March 1990 to April 1991. Lymphography was used as the reference method in the evaluation of the paraaortic and iliac lymphnodes. In 19% of the patients ultrasound examination could not be accomplished optimally, and these results were evaluated in a separate group. Lymphography demonstrated involvement of retroperitoneal lymphnodes in 27 patients, among these ultrasound was false negative in seven (= 26%). In ten patients ultrasound examination demonstrated lymphoma outside the lymphographic area. No false positive ultrasound examinations were found in the group with negative lymphography. Ultrasound cannot replace lymphography, but is an important supplement, and in those cases where ultrasound reveals lymphomas in the lymphographic area, lymphography can be omitted as ultrasound has a high predictive value.
对1990年3月至1991年4月期间连续检查的88例恶性淋巴瘤患者进行腹部超声和淋巴造影检查,比较两者在分期中的诊断价值。在评估腹主动脉旁和髂淋巴结时,淋巴造影被用作参考方法。19%的患者无法进行最佳的超声检查,这些结果单独分组评估。淋巴造影显示27例患者腹膜后淋巴结受累,其中超声检查有7例假阴性(=26%)。10例患者超声检查显示淋巴瘤位于淋巴造影区域之外。淋巴造影阴性组未发现超声检查假阳性。超声不能替代淋巴造影,但它是一种重要的补充检查,在超声显示淋巴造影区域有淋巴瘤的情况下,由于超声具有较高的预测价值,可以省略淋巴造影检查。