Suppr超能文献

对于正在接受静脉滴注缩宫素的初产妇,早期给予硬膜外镇痛会影响产科结局吗?

Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin?

作者信息

Chestnut D H, Vincent R D, McGrath J M, Choi W W, Bates J N

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1994 Jun;80(6):1193-200. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199406000-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some studies suggest that epidural analgesia prolongs labor and increases the incidence of cesarean section, especially if it is administered before 5 cm cervical dilation. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether early administration of epidural analgesia affects obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin.

METHODS

Informed consent was obtained from healthy nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation, who requested epidural analgesia while receiving intravenous oxytocin at at least 36 weeks' gestation. Each patient was randomized to receive either early or late epidural analgesia. Randomization occurred only after the following conditions were met: (1) the patient requested pain relief at that moment, (2) a lumbar epidural catheter had been placed, and (3) the cervix was at least 3 but less than 5 cm dilated. Patients in the early group immediately received epidural bupivacaine analgesia. Patients in the late group received 10 mg nalbuphine intravenously. Late-group patients did not receive epidural analgesia until they achieved a cervical dilation of at least 5 cm or until at least 1 h had elapsed after a second dose of nalbuphine.

RESULTS

Early administration of epidural analgesia did not prolong the interval between randomization and the diagnosis of complete cervical dilation, and it did not increase the incidence of malposition of the vertex at delivery. Also, early administration of epidural analgesia did not result in an increased incidence of cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery. Thirteen (18%) of 74 women in the early group and 14 (19%) of 75 women in the late group underwent cesarean section (relative risk for the early group 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.84). Patients in the early group had lower pain scores between 30 and 120 min after randomization, and were more likely to experience transient hypotension. Infants in the late group had lower umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and higher umbilical arterial and venous blood carbon dioxide tension measurements at delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of epidural analgesia did not prolong labor or increase the incidence of operative delivery, when compared with intravenous nalbuphine followed by late administration of epidural analgesia, in nulliparous women who were receiving intravenous oxytocin.

摘要

背景

一些研究表明,硬膜外镇痛会延长产程并增加剖宫产的发生率,尤其是在宫颈扩张5厘米之前使用时。本研究的目的是确定在接受静脉滴注缩宫素的初产妇中,早期给予硬膜外镇痛是否会影响产科结局。

方法

从妊娠至少36周、单胎头先露、要求硬膜外镇痛且正在接受静脉滴注缩宫素的健康初产妇处获得知情同意。每位患者随机分为早期或晚期硬膜外镇痛组。仅在满足以下条件后才进行随机分组:(1)患者当时要求缓解疼痛;(2)已置入腰段硬膜外导管;(3)宫颈扩张至少3厘米但小于5厘米。早期组患者立即接受硬膜外布比卡因镇痛。晚期组患者静脉注射10毫克纳布啡。晚期组患者在宫颈扩张至少5厘米或第二次注射纳布啡后至少1小时过去之前不接受硬膜外镇痛。

结果

早期给予硬膜外镇痛并未延长随机分组至宫颈完全扩张诊断之间的间隔时间,也未增加分娩时头位异常的发生率。此外,早期给予硬膜外镇痛并未导致剖宫产或器械助产阴道分娩的发生率增加。早期组74名女性中有13名(18%)、晚期组75名女性中有14名(19%)接受了剖宫产(早期组相对风险为0.94;95%置信区间为0.48 - 1.84)。早期组患者在随机分组后30至120分钟之间疼痛评分较低,且更易发生短暂性低血压。晚期组婴儿在分娩时脐动脉和静脉血pH值较低,脐动脉和静脉血二氧化碳分压测量值较高。

结论

在接受静脉滴注缩宫素治疗的初产妇中,与静脉注射纳布啡后延迟给予硬膜外镇痛相比,早期给予硬膜外镇痛并未延长产程或增加手术分娩的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验