• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一根或两根胸廓内动脉时医院发病率相似。

Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteries.

作者信息

Berreklouw E, Schönberger J P, Bavinck J H, Verwaal V J, Koldewijn E L, van der Linden F, van der Tweel I, Bredée J J

机构信息

Department of Cardio-pulmonary Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Jun;57(6):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90124-4.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(94)90124-4
PMID:8010804
Abstract

The hospital morbidity and mortality of 100 patients operated with two internal thoracic arteries with or without additional vein grafts (BITA group) were compared with a matched group of 100 patients operated with one left internal thoracic artery (ITA) on the anterior descending artery with additional vein grafts (LITA control group). In each study group, 3% of the patients had diabetes mellitus. There was no statistical significant difference in hospital mortality (1% versus 0%), perioperative myocardial infarction (5% versus 1%), low cardiac output (3% versus 5%), rethoracotomy (1% versus 0%), lung complications (13% versus 13%), wound complications (8% versus 8%), other cardiac complications (26% versus 16%), other noncardiac complications (1% versus 4%), median duration of stay in the intensive care unit (1 versus 1 day), and mean duration of stay in the hospital (10.4 versus 10.8 days) between the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of ITAs used was not a predictor of complications. Thus, there is no difference between the BITA and LITA control group in hospital mortality and morbidity (in patients with a low incidence of diabetes). If an improvement in cardiac event-free and reoperation-free survival is to be expected, the use of both ITAs can be continued in similar patients.

摘要

将100例接受双侧胸廓内动脉搭桥术(无论是否加用静脉移植物)的患者(BITA组)的医院发病率和死亡率,与100例接受左胸廓内动脉(ITA)在前降支搭桥并加用静脉移植物的匹配患者(LITA对照组)进行比较。在每个研究组中,3%的患者患有糖尿病。两组在医院死亡率(1%对0%)、围手术期心肌梗死(5%对1%)、低心排血量(3%对5%)、再次开胸手术(1%对0%)、肺部并发症(13%对13%)、伤口并发症(8%对8%)、其他心脏并发症(26%对16%)、其他非心脏并发症(1%对4%)、重症监护病房中位住院时间(1天对1天)以及医院平均住院时间(10.4天对10.8天)方面均无统计学显著差异。逻辑回归分析显示,使用的ITA数量不是并发症的预测因素。因此,BITA组和LITA对照组在医院死亡率和发病率方面无差异(糖尿病发病率低的患者)。如果预期无心脏事件和无再次手术生存率有所改善,在类似患者中可继续使用双侧ITA。

相似文献

1
Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteries.使用一根或两根胸廓内动脉时医院发病率相似。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Jun;57(6):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90124-4.
2
Multiple arterial grafts. Radial versus right internal thoracic arteries.多支动脉移植物。桡动脉与右胸廓内动脉的比较。
Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II7-13; discussion II13-4.
3
Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts.15 年以上胸廓内动脉移植的结果:单支与双支移植
Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):202-8; discussion 208-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90139-w.
4
Myocardial revascularization with modified T-graft using bilateral internal thoracic arteries.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Dec;5(6):391-5.
5
Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.采用多支左侧双侧胸廓内动脉移植可提高生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jul;64(1):9-14; discussion 15. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00473-6.
6
Operation for two-vessel coronary artery disease: midterm results of bilateral ITA grafting versus unilateral ITA and saphenous vein grafting.双支冠状动脉疾病的手术治疗:双侧胸廓内动脉移植与单侧胸廓内动脉及大隐静脉移植的中期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00627-3.
7
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery. Risk-adjusted survival.双侧胸廓内动脉移植术可能改善冠状动脉手术的预后。风险调整后的生存率。
Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II1-6.
8
Total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts improves results of coronary surgery in elderly: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass surgery.使用复合移植物进行全动脉心肌血运重建可改善老年患者冠状动脉手术的效果:一项与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108 Suppl 1:II29-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087941.75337.f5.
9
Double supply to left anterior descending artery by additional saphenous vein graft in internal thoracic artery malperfusion syndrome.胸廓内动脉灌注不良综合征中经额外的大隐静脉移植对左前降支动脉进行双重供血。
J Card Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):410-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00257.x.
10
Does bilateral ITA grafting increase perioperative complications? Outcome of 4462 patients with bilateral versus 4204 patients with single ITA bypass.双侧胸廓内动脉移植是否会增加围手术期并发症?4462例双侧胸廓内动脉搭桥患者与4204例单侧胸廓内动脉搭桥患者的结果对比。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Total arterial coronary revascularization-patient selection, stenoses, conduits, targets.全动脉化冠状动脉血运重建-患者选择、狭窄病变、桥血管、靶血管。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):499-506. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.02.
2
[Arterial myocardial revascularization in the 9th decade of life. Personal results and review of the literature].[90岁高龄患者的动脉心肌血运重建。个人经验及文献综述]
Herz. 1999 Apr;24(2):158-70. doi: 10.1007/BF03043855.
3
[Clinical evaluation of right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) graft--comparison of RGEA with right internal thoracic artery (RITA) graft in the coronary bypass grafting (CABG) operation using only arterial grafts].
[胃网膜右动脉(RGEA)移植物的临床评估——在仅使用动脉移植物的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中RGEA与右胸廓内动脉(RITA)移植物的比较]
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Jun;46(6):538-43. doi: 10.1007/BF03250596.