Mangione S, Peitzman S J, Gracely E, Nieman L Z
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129.
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Apr;9(4):213-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600127.
To evaluate the effects of a course in physical diagnosis on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of internal medicine trainees.
A controlled, prospective assignment of housestaff to a year-long curricular program, linked to a set of pre- and posttests. Houseofficers who could not attend the teaching sessions functioned as control subjects.
An internal medicine training program at an urban medical school.
56 (86.1%) of 65 eligible internal medicine housestaff (post-graduate years 1 through 3) participated in the intervention and assessment. A comparison group of 14 senior medical students participated in the pretest.
12 monthly lectures emphasizing skills useful in emergencies or validated by the literature.
The pre- and posttests included: 1) a multiple-choice questionnaire to assess knowledge; 2) professional standardized patients to assess selected skills; and 3) Likert-type questionnaires to assess self-motivated learning and attitude toward diagnosis not based on technology.
The residents expressed interest in the program and on a six-point scale rated the usefulness of lectures and standardized patients as 3.5 +/- 1.3 and 4.3 +/- 1, respectively. For no system tested, however, did they achieve more than 55.2% correct answers (range: 24.2%-55.2%, median = 41.04), and their performance did not differ from that of the fourth-year medical students. There was no significant difference in pre/posttest improvement between the control and intervention groups.
These data confirm the deficiencies of physical diagnostic skills and knowledge among physicians in training. These deficiencies were not corrected by the classroom lecture series. Improvement in these skills may require a more intense experiential program made part of residency requirements.
评估物理诊断课程对内科学实习生知识、技能和态度的影响。
将住院医师前瞻性地随机分配到为期一年的课程计划中,并与一组课前和课后测试相关联。无法参加教学课程的住院医师作为对照对象。
一所城市医学院的内科学培训项目。
65名符合条件的内科学住院医师(研究生1至3年级)中有56名(86.1%)参与了干预和评估。14名高年级医学生组成的对照组参加了课前测试。
每月进行12次讲座,重点讲解在紧急情况下有用或经文献验证的技能。
课前和课后测试包括:1)一份多项选择题问卷,用于评估知识;2)专业标准化病人,用于评估选定的技能;3)李克特式问卷,用于评估自我激励学习以及对不基于技术的诊断的态度。
住院医师对该项目表示感兴趣,在六点量表上对讲座和标准化病人的有用性评分分别为3.5±1.3和4.3±1。然而,对于所测试的任何系统,他们的正确答案率均未超过55.2%(范围:24.2%-55.2%,中位数 = 41.04),且他们的表现与四年级医学生没有差异。对照组和干预组在课前/课后的进步方面没有显著差异。
这些数据证实了培训中的医生在物理诊断技能和知识方面存在不足。课堂讲座系列并未纠正这些不足。这些技能的提高可能需要一个更强化的实践项目,并将其纳入住院医师培训要求。