Mandel J H, Rich E C, Luxenberg M G, Spilane M T, Kern D C, Parrino T A
Department of Internal Medicine, St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, MN 55101.
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Apr;148(4):853-6.
To evaluate the adequacy of preparation for medical practice, we surveyed 320 internal medicine program graduates. The 210 respondents gave their perceptions regarding preparation in training and importance in practice of eight clinical practice skills and 27 clinical procedure skills. The skills with highest preparation scores were venipuncture, intravenous line placement, and arterial puncture for blood gases. The skills rated as the most important in practice were history taking, physical examination, and selection of diagnostic tests. For 13 of the 27 clinical procedure skills, mean preparation scores were significantly higher than mean importance scores, suggesting "overpreparation." In contrast, seven of the eight clinical practice skills had mean preparation scores significantly lower than mean importance scores, suggesting "underpreparation." Furthermore, greater preparation during training was reported by more recent graduates for five of the overprepared skills. We concluded that skills emphasized in internal medicine training are not necessarily those important for practice and that recent changes in the training and practice environments may be increasing these discrepancies.
为评估医学实践准备的充分性,我们对320名内科住院医师培训项目毕业生进行了调查。210名受访者就八项临床实践技能和27项临床操作技能在培训中的准备情况以及在实践中的重要性给出了他们的看法。准备得分最高的技能是静脉穿刺、静脉置管和动脉血气穿刺。实践中被评为最重要的技能是病史采集、体格检查和诊断检查的选择。对于27项临床操作技能中的13项,平均准备得分显著高于平均重要性得分,表明存在“过度准备”。相比之下,八项临床实践技能中的七项平均准备得分显著低于平均重要性得分,表明存在“准备不足”。此外,对于五项过度准备的技能,近期毕业生报告在培训期间的准备程度更高。我们得出结论,内科培训中强调的技能不一定是实践中重要的技能,并且培训和实践环境的近期变化可能正在加剧这些差异。