Seo H, Doi Y L, Yonezawa Y, Chikamori T, Yamada M, Ozawa T
Department of Medicine and Gerontology, Kochi Medical School, Japan.
Jpn Circ J. 1994 Mar;58(3):206-13. doi: 10.1253/jcj.58.206.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of a transient dilatation of the left ventricle during dipyridamole-thallium imaging (DTI) for detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with negative DTI results, 81 consecutive patients were studied. Twenty one patients (26%) had CAD and 60 patients had normal coronary anatomy (NCA). The initial/delayed ratio of the left ventricular dimension, which was measured as the distance between the 2 peaks of a count profile curve on a 45 degrees left anterior oblique planar image, was defined as the dilatation ratio (DR) of the left ventricle. Patients with CAD had a higher incidence of chest pain after dipyridamole infusion (35 vs 13%; p < 0.05), and ST depression during exercise testing (50 vs 25%; p < 0.05) than those with NCA. DR was significantly greater in CAD patients than in NCA patients (1.08 +/- 0.10 vs 0.97 +/- 0.03; p < 0.0001). DR was considered abnormal (> 1.03) when it was greater than the mean +2 standard deviations of the DR in NCA patients. Seventy-six percent of CAD patients had an abnormal DR. A stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that an abnormal DR alone had the same ability to predict CAD (sensitivity 76%, specificity 98%, chi-square 80.9, p < 0.0001) as the best combination of abnormal DR, chest pain during exercise testing, age and gender (sensitivity 76%, specificity 98%, chi-square 98.5, p < 0.0001). When abnormal DR was excluded from this analysis, the best combination of the variables showed a reduced ability to predict CAD (sensitivity 81%, specificity 77%, Wilks' Lambda 0.71, chi-square 26.7, p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为评估双嘧达莫 - 铊心肌显像(DTI)时左心室短暂扩张对检测DTI结果为阴性的患者严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断价值,对81例连续患者进行了研究。21例患者(26%)患有CAD,60例患者冠状动脉解剖结构正常(NCA)。左心室尺寸的初始/延迟比值,通过在45度左前斜平面图像上计数轮廓曲线的两个峰值之间的距离来测量,被定义为左心室扩张率(DR)。与NCA患者相比,CAD患者在输注双嘧达莫后胸痛发生率更高(35%对13%;p<0.05),运动试验期间ST段压低发生率更高(50%对25%;p<0.05)。CAD患者的DR显著高于NCA患者(1.08±0.10对0.97±0.03;p<0.0001)。当DR大于NCA患者DR平均值+2个标准差时,DR被认为异常(>1.03)。76%的CAD患者DR异常。逐步判别分析显示,单独的异常DR预测CAD的能力(敏感性76%,特异性98%,卡方值80.9,p<0.0001)与异常DR、运动试验期间胸痛、年龄和性别的最佳组合相同(敏感性76%,特异性98%,卡方值98.5,p<0.0001)。当从该分析中排除异常DR时,变量的最佳组合预测CAD的能力降低(敏感性81%,特异性77%,威尔克斯'λ0.71,卡方值26.7,p<0.0001)。(摘要截断于250字)