• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多胎妊娠的经济影响以及辅助生殖技术对其发生率的影响。

The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence.

作者信息

Callahan T L, Hall J E, Ettner S L, Christiansen C L, Greene M F, Crowley W F

机构信息

National Center for Infertility Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 28;331(4):244-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407283310407.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199407283310407
PMID:8015572
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the medical complications associated with multiple-gestation pregnancies have been well documented, little is known about the effects of such pregnancies on the use of health care resources and the associated costs. This is an important issue because of the increasing use of assisted-reproduction techniques, which commonly result in multiple-gestation pregnancies.

METHODS

We determined hospital charges and the use of assisted-reproduction techniques (such as induction of ovulation, in vitro fertilization, and gamete intrafallopian transfer) for 13,206 pregnant women (11,986 with singleton pregnancies, 1135 with twin pregnancies, and 85 with more than two fetuses) who were admitted for delivery to Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, in 1986 through 1991 and their 14,033 neonates (11,671 singletons, 2144 twins, and 218 resulting from higher-order multiple gestations).

RESULTS

After we controlled for variables known to affect hospital charges, the predicted total charges to the family in 1991 for a singleton delivery were $9,845, as compared with $37,947 for twins ($18,974 per baby) and $109,765 for triplets ($36,588 per baby). Assisted-reproduction techniques were used in 2 percent of singleton, 35 percent of twin, and 77 percent of higher-order multiple-gestation pregnancies; such procedures were approximately equally divided between induction of ovulation alone and in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple-gestation pregnancies, a high proportion of which result from the use of assisted-reproduction techniques, dramatically increase hospital charges. If all the multiple gestations resulting from assisted-reproduction techniques, dramatically increase hospital charges. If all the multiple gestations resulting from assisted-reproduction techniques had been singleton pregnancies, the predicted savings to the health care delivery system in the study hospital alone would have been over $3 million per year. Although assisted reproduction provides tremendous benefits to families with infertility, the increased medical risks entailed by multiple-gestation pregnancies and the associated costs cannot be ignored. We suggest that more attention be paid to approaches to infertility that reduce the likelihood of multiple gestation.

摘要

背景

尽管与多胎妊娠相关的医学并发症已有充分记录,但对于此类妊娠对医疗资源使用及相关费用的影响却知之甚少。鉴于辅助生殖技术的使用日益增多,而该技术通常会导致多胎妊娠,这是一个重要问题。

方法

我们确定了1986年至1991年期间在波士顿布里格姆妇女医院分娩的13206名孕妇(11986名单胎妊娠、1135名双胎妊娠和85名多胎妊娠)及其14033名新生儿(11671名单胎、2144名双胎和218名多胎妊娠儿)的住院费用以及辅助生殖技术(如促排卵、体外受精和输卵管内配子移植)的使用情况。

结果

在我们对已知影响住院费用的变量进行控制后,1991年单胎分娩家庭的预计总费用为9845美元,而双胎分娩为37947美元(每个婴儿18974美元),三胎分娩为109765美元(每个婴儿36588美元)。单胎妊娠中有2%使用了辅助生殖技术,双胎妊娠中有35%,多胎妊娠中有77%;此类程序在单纯促排卵与体外受精或输卵管内配子移植之间大致平分。

结论

多胎妊娠,其中很大一部分是由辅助生殖技术导致的,会大幅增加住院费用。如果辅助生殖技术导致的所有多胎妊娠都是单胎妊娠,仅研究医院的医疗保健系统预计每年就能节省超过300万美元。尽管辅助生殖为不孕家庭带来了巨大益处,但多胎妊娠带来的增加的医疗风险及相关费用不容忽视。我们建议更多关注降低多胎妊娠可能性的不孕治疗方法。

相似文献

1
The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence.多胎妊娠的经济影响以及辅助生殖技术对其发生率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 28;331(4):244-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407283310407.
2
Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group.多胎妊娠。ESHRE卡普里研讨会小组。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15(8):1856-64.
3
Does assisted reproduction technology, per se, increase the risk of preterm birth?辅助生殖技术本身会增加早产风险吗?
BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:68-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01126.x.
4
[Perinatal results in pregnancies obtained with embryo transfer in vitro fertilization: a case-control study].[体外受精胚胎移植妊娠的围产期结局:一项病例对照研究]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006 Dec;74(12):626-39.
5
Do assisted-reproduction twin pregnancies require additional antenatal care?辅助生殖技术双胎妊娠是否需要增加产前检查?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
6
Assisted reproduction technology, multiple births, and adverse perinatal outcome.辅助生殖技术、多胎妊娠与不良围产期结局
Croat Med J. 1998 Jun;39(2):208-11.
7
Complications of pregnancy in infertile couples: routine treatment versus assisted reproduction.
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):790-4.
8
Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.健康维护组织的辅助生殖技术成本。
J Reprod Med. 1997 Sep;42(9):570-4.
9
Retinopathy of prematurity in assisted versus natural conception and singleton versus multiple births.辅助受孕与自然受孕以及单胎与多胎妊娠中的早产儿视网膜病变
Ophthalmology. 2007 Feb;114(2):321-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.010.
10
Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF.配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)和体外受精(IVF)后单胎和双胎妊娠的妊娠并发症、产科风险及新生儿结局
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;268(4):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0518-5. Epub 2003 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic nexus of assisted reproduction technique efficacy in infertile women: insights from a comprehensive retrospective study.辅助生殖技术对不孕女性疗效的遗传关联:一项全面回顾性研究的见解
J Appl Genet. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s13353-025-00961-9.
2
Elective Single Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer in IVF Patients with Suboptimal Ovarian Response is Not Detrimental to Cumulative Pregnancy and Reduces Multiple Pregnancy Rates.对卵巢反应欠佳的体外受精患者进行选择性单卵裂期胚胎移植对累积妊娠无害且可降低多胎妊娠率。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Aug;73(4):329-335. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01768-6. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles.
在冷冻周期中移植 1 个与 2 个低质量囊胚时,活产率和多胎妊娠率是多少?一项按年龄、胚胎质量和卵母细胞供体周期分层的回顾性队列研究。
Reprod Sci. 2021 May;28(5):1403-1411. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00404-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Current evidence supporting a goal of singletons: a review of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with twin versus singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.目前支持单胎妊娠目标的证据:体外受精和胞浆内单精子注射后双胎与单胎妊娠相关的母婴围产结局的综述。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):690-714. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1423.
5
SMFM Special Statement: State of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance.SMFM 特别声明:多胎妊娠的科学现状:独特的考虑因素和重要性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;221(2):B2-B12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Delayed interval delivery of the second twin in a woman with altered markers of inflammation.炎症标志物改变的产妇第二胎儿延迟间隔分娩。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1848-4.
7
Costs of maternal and neonatal medical care for triplet and quadruplet pregnancies in Japan.日本三胞胎和四胞胎妊娠的孕产妇及新生儿医疗费用。
Reprod Med Biol. 2004 Aug 10;3(3):159-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2004.00067.x. eCollection 2004 Sep.
8
Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one.选择性单胚胎移植——一个的力量。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Jul 6;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0023-4. eCollection 2016.
9
Single Blastocyst Transfer: The Key to Reduce Multiple Pregnancy Rates Without Compromising the Live Birth Rate.单囊胚移植:在不影响活产率的情况下降低多胎妊娠率的关键。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):201-207. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_130_16.
10
Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.辅助生殖后怀孕:一个高危妊娠诞生了!比利时弗拉芒地区基于人群的登记处18年围产期结局结果
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016 Dec;8(4):193-204.