Increasing the accessibility of data.
作者信息
Smith G D
出版信息
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1519-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1519.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Increasing the accessibility of data.提高数据的可获取性。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1519-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1519.
2
Meta-analysis. Unresolved issues and future developments.荟萃分析。未解决的问题与未来发展。
BMJ. 1998 Jan 17;316(7126):221-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.221.
3
The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.系统评价在临床研究与实践中的作用。
Clin Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;35(2):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.10.003.
4
Evidence based medicine.循证医学
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006 Jul-Sep;4(3):383-9.
5
Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it is not.循证医学：其内涵与外延
Injury. 2006 Apr;37(4):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.034. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
6
Systematic review--a method for nursing research.系统评价——一种护理研究方法。
Nurse Res. 2008;16(1):72-83. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.10.16.1.72.c6754.
7
Evaluation and research.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2006 Summer;25(2):109-17. doi: 10.1300/J115v25n02_09.
8
In response to "Brimful of STARLITE".回应《充满星尘》
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jul;95(3):233; author reply 233. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.117.
9
Data management.数据管理。
Air Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):156-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2008.05.001.
10
Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach.进行文献综述：循序渐进的方法。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(1):38-43. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059.
引用本文的文献
1
Evidence triangulation in health research.健康研究中的证据三角互证法
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01194-6.
2
Mendel's laws, Mendelian randomization and causal inference in observational data: substantive and nomenclatural issues.孟德尔定律、观察性数据中的孟德尔随机化和因果推断：实质和命名问题。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;35(2):99-111. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00622-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Post-Modern Epidemiology: When Methods Meet Matter.后现代流行病学：方法与物质相遇之时。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;188(8):1410-1419. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz064.
4
Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.低收入和中等收入环境下个人层面健康研究数据的道德共享最佳实践。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):302-13. doi: 10.1177/1556264615594606.
5
Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学与公共卫生研究中个体层面数据共享的伦理最佳实践观点：一项系统性综述
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):225-38. doi: 10.1177/1556264615594767.
6
Sharing with More Caring: Coordinating and Improving the Ethical Governance of Data and Biomaterials Obtained from Children.与更多关怀者分享：协调并改善从儿童处获取的数据和生物样本的伦理治理
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 1;10(7):e0130527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130527. eCollection 2015.
7
Estimating the re-identification risk of clinical data sets.估算临床数据集的再识别风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 9;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-66.
8
Lack of proportionality. Seven specifications of public interest that override post-approval commercial interests on limited access to clinical data.缺乏相称性。有七个公共利益的规范，凌驾于有限获取临床数据的上市后商业利益之上。
Trials. 2012 Jul 2;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-100.
9
De-identifying a public use microdata file from the Canadian national discharge abstract database.从加拿大国家出院摘要数据库中去除公开使用的微观数据文件的标识符。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Aug 23;11:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-53.
10
The re-identification risk of Canadians from longitudinal demographics.从纵向人口统计学角度来看加拿大国民的再识别风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Jun 22;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-46.
本文引用的文献
1
The scandal of poor medical research.糟糕的医学研究丑闻。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
2
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?文献的Meta分析或个体患者数据的Meta分析：有区别吗？
Lancet. 1993 Feb 13;341(8842):418-22. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-k.
3
Obtaining access to data from government-sponsored medical research.获取政府资助的医学研究数据。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Dec 25;315(26):1669-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612253152608.
4
Efficacy of amoxicillin with and without decongestant-antihistamine for otitis media with effusion in children. Results of a double-blind, randomized trial.阿莫西林联合与不联合减充血剂-抗组胺药治疗儿童分泌性中耳炎的疗效。一项双盲随机试验的结果
N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 19;316(8):432-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702193160803.
5
Pertussis vaccine and severe acute neurological illnesses. Response to a recent review by members of the NCES team.百日咳疫苗与严重急性神经疾病。对国家疫苗安全评估（NCES）团队成员近期一篇综述的回应
Vaccine. 1989 Dec;7(6):487-9. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(89)90268-5.
6
Data sharing: a declining ethic?数据共享：一种正在衰退的道德准则？
Science. 1990 May 25;248(4958):952-7. doi: 10.1126/science.2343306.
7
The art and science of interpreting survey data.解读调查数据的艺术与科学。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Dec;80(12):1427-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.12.1427.
8
Meta-meta-analysis: unanswered questions about aggregating data.元元分析：关于汇总数据的未解决问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90258-b.
9
Lessons from the pertussis vaccine court trial.百日咳疫苗法庭审判的教训。
Lancet. 1990 Feb 17;335(8686):397-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90220-y.
10
How independent are "independent" effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely.“独立”效应的独立性如何？相关暴露测量不精确时的相对风险估计。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1223-31. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90155-3.
Zotero 插件