Plough A, Olafson F
Department of Health and Hospitals, Boston, MA 02118.
Health Educ Q. 1994 Summer;21(2):221-34. doi: 10.1177/109019819402100207.
This article examines the efforts on the part of a city health department, in partnership with a broad-based coalition of community-based, government, and social service agencies, to plan and implement, using principles of empowerment and community participation, a federally funded infant mortality reduction program. It examines the social and institutional dynamics of sharing power in an environment highly charged politically. Infant mortality in Boston is much more than a public health problem. It is the focal point of complex racial, political, and institutional factors. This case study illustrates how empowerment moves from rhetoric to reality and the challenge to both traditional public health practice and traditional community mobilization. The article describes the federal Healthy Start Initiative and its community participation mandate, the background on infant mortality in Boston, a case study of the development of the Healthy Start program from the perspective of community empowerment, and finally, the lessons learned in the first 2 years of the program. It describes the controversies encountered, some of the mistakes made, and the ways found that government must be reinvented if empowerment is to be a real public health tool.
本文探讨了一个城市卫生部门与社区、政府及社会服务机构组成的广泛联盟合作,运用赋权和社区参与原则,规划并实施一项由联邦政府资助的降低婴儿死亡率项目的努力。它考察了在政治氛围高度紧张的环境中权力共享的社会和制度动态。波士顿的婴儿死亡率远不止是一个公共卫生问题。它是复杂的种族、政治和制度因素的焦点。本案例研究说明了赋权如何从言辞变为现实,以及对传统公共卫生实践和传统社区动员的挑战。文章介绍了联邦“健康开端倡议”及其社区参与要求,波士顿婴儿死亡率的背景情况,从社区赋权角度对“健康开端”项目发展的案例研究,以及该项目头两年所吸取的经验教训。它描述了所遇到的争议、一些所犯的错误,以及发现的若要使赋权成为真正的公共卫生工具政府必须进行重塑的方式。