• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in general practice. A Nordic multicentre clinical study.

作者信息

Rosenberg C, Damsbo N, Fuglum E, Jacobsen L V, Horsgård S

机构信息

H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby-Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Mar;9 Suppl 1:41-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199403001-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00004850-199403001-00007
PMID:8021437
Abstract

Two dose levels of citalopram, 10-30 mg and 20-60 mg, were compared with imipramine, 50-150 mg, in depressed patients treated in general practice. This was a multicentre study carried out in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. The duration of treatment was 6 weeks with an optional continuation phase of a further 16 weeks. The patients were assessed by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and a visual analogue self-rating scale for depression. Observed and spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded. A total of 472 patients were entered into the study and 400 patients completed the 6 week trial period. A total of 297 patients completed the optional 22 week double-blind period. A clear reduction of the HAMD total scores was seen in all three treatment groups with no significant differences between groups. A reduction of the HAMD anxiety factor and sleep factor scores was also seen with no significant differences between treatments. The imipramine-treated patients showed a higher frequency of adverse events, especially the anticholinergic type, than citalopram-treated patients. Most patients entered into the continuation phase remained well.

摘要

相似文献

1
Citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in general practice. A Nordic multicentre clinical study.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Mar;9 Suppl 1:41-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199403001-00007.
2
Citalopram versus fluoxetine: a double-blind, controlled, multicentre, phase III trial in patients with unipolar major depression treated in general practice.西酞普兰与氟西汀对比:一项在全科医疗中治疗单相重度抑郁症患者的双盲、对照、多中心III期试验。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11(2):129-36.
3
Fluvoxamine maleate in the treatment of depression: a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with imipramine in outpatients.马来酸氟伏沙明治疗抑郁症:一项在门诊患者中进行的单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照并与丙咪嗪比较的研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Apr;16(2):113-20. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199604000-00003.
4
Relapse prevention by means of paroxetine in ECT-treated patients with major depression: a comparison with imipramine and placebo in medium-term continuation therapy.帕罗西汀用于预防ECT治疗的重度抑郁症患者复发:与丙咪嗪和安慰剂在中期持续治疗中的比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Oct;94(4):241-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09856.x.
5
Citalopram versus amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients with or without mild cognitive dysfunction: a danish multicentre trial in general practice.西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗伴有或不伴有轻度认知功能障碍的老年抑郁症患者:丹麦全科医学多中心试验
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2007;40(1):63-73.
6
Escitalopram continuation treatment prevents relapse of depressive episodes.艾司西酞普兰持续治疗可预防抑郁发作的复发。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;65(1):44-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0107.
7
Nomifensine vs. imipramine in depressed inpatients.诺米芬辛与丙咪嗪治疗住院抑郁症患者的对比研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;45(4 Pt 2):60-2.
8
A comparison of fluoxetine and imipramine in the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorder.氟西汀与丙咪嗪治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者的比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Apr;87(4):269-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03370.x.
9
Paroxetine and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in psychiatric practice.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Dec;86(6):437-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03294.x.
10
Fluvoxamine and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients: a double-blind controlled study.氟伏沙明与丙咪嗪治疗抑郁症患者:一项双盲对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;12(3):177-84. doi: 10.1185/03007999009111499.

引用本文的文献

1
Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2.
2
Antidepressants and sleep: a qualitative review of the literature.抗抑郁药与睡眠:文献的定性综述
Drugs. 2005;65(7):927-47. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565070-00003.
3
Citalopram--a review of pharmacological and clinical effects.西酞普兰——药理作用与临床效果综述
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000 May;25(3):241-54.
4
The selection of data sources for use in modelling studies.用于建模研究的数据源的选择。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):305-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00005.
5
A Markov process analysis comparing the cost effectiveness of maintenance therapy with citalopram versus standard therapy in major depression.一项比较西酞普兰维持治疗与标准治疗对重度抑郁症成本效益的马尔可夫过程分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Aug;8(2):159-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508020-00007.
6
Chronic administration of imipramine and citalopram alters the expression of NMDA receptor subunit mRNAs in mouse brain. A quantitative in situ hybridization study.慢性给予丙咪嗪和西酞普兰会改变小鼠脑中NMDA受体亚基mRNA的表达。一项定量原位杂交研究。
J Mol Neurosci. 1998 Jun;10(3):219-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02761776.