• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于建模研究的数据源的选择。

The selection of data sources for use in modelling studies.

作者信息

Nuijten M J

机构信息

Lewin Group, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):305-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00005.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199813030-00005
PMID:10178656
Abstract

Economic analysis has become increasingly important in healthcare in general, and particularly with respect to pharmaceuticals. Therefore, it is vital that the methods used in such evaluations are carefully scrutinised and refined. However, guidelines contain only a limited number of recommendations for the use of secondary data in modelling studies. In this manuscript, the selection of data sources in modelling studies will be addressed. The objectives of this manuscript are as follows: (i) to present a general strategy on how to determine the appropriateness of a data source for a model; and (ii) to present recommendations on a transparent reporting format for the selection of data sources.

摘要

一般而言,经济分析在医疗保健领域,尤其是在制药方面,已变得越来越重要。因此,对这类评估中所使用的方法进行仔细审查和完善至关重要。然而,指南中关于在建模研究中使用二手数据的建议数量有限。在本手稿中,将探讨建模研究中数据来源的选择。本手稿的目标如下:(i) 提出一个关于如何确定模型数据源适用性的总体策略;(ii) 就数据源选择的透明报告格式提出建议。

相似文献

1
The selection of data sources for use in modelling studies.用于建模研究的数据源的选择。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):305-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00005.
2
Estimating drug costs in economic evaluations in Ireland and the UK: an analysis of practice and research recommendations.爱尔兰和英国经济评估中的药品成本估算:实践与研究建议分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(8):635-43. doi: 10.2165/10899570-000000000-00000.
3
Design, analysis and presentation of multinational economic studies: the need for guidance.跨国经济研究的设计、分析与呈现:指导的必要性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(2):75-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220020-00001.
4
An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation.经济评估中的马尔可夫模型介绍。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Apr;13(4):397-409. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813040-00003.
5
Reporting format for economic evaluation. Part II: Focus on modelling studies.经济评估报告格式。第二部分:聚焦建模研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Sep;14(3):259-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814030-00003.
6
Modeling economic evaluations of pharmaceuticals: manipulation or valuable tool?
Clin Ther. 1999 May;21(5):896-908; discussion 895. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80011-3.
7
Analysis sans frontières: can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions?无国界分析:我们能否使经济评估在不同司法管辖区具有通用性?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(11):1087-99. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624110-00006.
8
Recommended structure for reporting economic evaluation on pharmaceuticals in Belgium.
Pharm World Sci. 2002 Feb;24(1):5-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1014896830042.
9
[Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].新药的成本效益影响报销决策,但仍有改进空间。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A958.
10
Proposed drug-drug cost effectiveness methodology.
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;40(3):524-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.140010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying best modelling practices for tobacco control policy simulations: a systematic review and a novel quality assessment framework.识别烟草控制政策模拟的最佳建模实践:系统评价和新的质量评估框架。
Tob Control. 2023 Sep;32(5):589-598. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056825. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of text messaging to support health advice for smoking cessation.用于支持戒烟健康建议的短信成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00262-y.
3
Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Treatments for Depression: A Systematic Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of consensus methods and expert panels in pharmacoeconomic studies. Practical applications and methodological shortcomings.共识方法和专家小组在药物经济学研究中的应用。实际应用和方法学缺陷。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):121-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00003.
2
Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.药物经济学研究的方法学与实施原则。美国制药研究与制造商协会。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Aug;8(2):169-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508020-00008.
3
A Markov process analysis comparing the cost effectiveness of maintenance therapy with citalopram versus standard therapy in major depression.
基于模型的抑郁症治疗经济评估:系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Sep;1(3):149-165. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0014-7.
4
Methods to construct a step-by-step beginner's guide to decision analytic cost-effectiveness modeling.构建决策分析成本效益建模循序渐进新手指南的方法。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 11;8:573-581. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S113569. eCollection 2016.
5
Health economic evaluation of paricalcitol(®) versus cinacalcet + calcitriol (oral) in Italy. [corrected].帕立骨化醇(®)与西那卡塞+骨化三醇(口服)在意大利的卫生经济学评价。[已校正]
Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Apr;35(4):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0264-4.
6
Evidence synthesis for decision making 5: the baseline natural history model.循证决策 5:基线自然史模型。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):657-70. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13485155.
7
Model-based cost-effectiveness analyses for prostate cancer chemoprevention : a review and summary of challenges.基于模型的前列腺癌化学预防成本效益分析:挑战的回顾与总结。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Apr;31(4):289-304. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0037-6.
8
The budget impact of oral nutritional supplements for disease related malnutrition in elderly in the community setting.
Front Pharmacol. 2012 May 4;3:78. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00078. eCollection 2012.
9
A critical review of model-based economic studies of depression: modelling techniques, model structure and data sources.抑郁的基于模型的经济学研究的批判性回顾:建模技术、模型结构和数据源。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jun 1;30(6):461-82. doi: 10.2165/11590500-000000000-00000.
10
Grand challenges in pharmacoeconomics and health outcomes.药物经济学与健康结果的重大挑战。
Front Pharmacol. 2010 Jun 23;1:7. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2010.00007. eCollection 2010.
一项比较西酞普兰维持治疗与标准治疗对重度抑郁症成本效益的马尔可夫过程分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Aug;8(2):159-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508020-00007.
4
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.《英国医学杂志》经济学投稿的作者及同行评审指南。《英国医学杂志》经济评估工作小组。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275.
5
Report from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada.加拿大卫生技术评估协调办公室(CCOHTA)报告。药品经济评估指南:加拿大。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Fall;11(4):796-7. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009247.
6
Are guidelines for peer-reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice.
Health Econ. 1995 Sep-Oct;4(5):383-8. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730040504.
7
A 24-week study of 20 mg citalopram, 40 mg citalopram, and placebo in the prevention of relapse of major depression.一项关于20毫克西酞普兰、40毫克西酞普兰和安慰剂预防重度抑郁症复发的24周研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Fall;8(3):181-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199300830-00008.
8
The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion.德尔菲法:方法学探讨
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jan;19(1):180-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x.
9
Citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in general practice. A Nordic multicentre clinical study.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Mar;9 Suppl 1:41-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199403001-00007.
10
The Delphi methodology (Part Two): A useful administrative approach.德尔菲法(第二部分):一种实用的管理方法。
Can J Nurs Adm. 1994 Nov-Dec;7(4):7-20.