Fetscher M, Müller-Jensen K
Augenklinik, Städtischen Klinikums Karlsruhe.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Apr;204(4):217-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035520.
Can the capsulotomy with small radial incisions compared to the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with perfect IOL centration still be recommended? This problem should be clarified under standard conditions.
On 100 patients both procedures were applied alternating with corneoscleral incision, phacoemulsification and endocapsular implantation of a 6 mm one-piece PMMA lens.
The perfect IOL-centration following capsulorhexis (0.25 +/- 0.31 mm) is confirmed. But the circular capsular fibrosis can make it difficult to examine the fundus periphery or to perform a secondary cataract aspiration. The IOL centration after capsulotomy is not always ideal (0.55 +/- 0.51 mm) but sufficient. Advantages are the simplicity of the procedure and an easy approach to the posterior capsule in case of secondary cataract.
Both methods are still appropriate.
与能实现人工晶状体完美居中的连续环形撕囊相比,小放射状切口的晶状体切开术是否仍值得推荐?这个问题应在标准条件下予以明确。
对100例患者进行这两种手术,手术交替进行,同时行角巩膜切口、超声乳化及植入6毫米一体式聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工晶状体。
证实了环形撕囊后人工晶状体的完美居中(0.25±0.31毫米)。但圆形囊膜纤维化可能会使检查眼底周边部或进行二期白内障抽吸变得困难。晶状体切开术后人工晶状体的居中情况并不总是理想(0.55±0.51毫米),但已足够。其优点是手术操作简单,在二期白内障情况下易于进入后囊膜。
两种方法仍然适用。