Stickle D F, Vossen K M, Riley D A, Fried M G
Department of Biological Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033.
J Theor Biol. 1994 May 7;168(1):1-12. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1082.
Transcription in E. coli is often controlled by the binding of specific gene-regulatory proteins. Binding of these proteins to their specific DNA binding sites occurs in the presence of a large excess of "nonspecific" genomic DNA. Binding to a specific DNA site thus depends on the concentration of regulatory protein, on its affinities for specific and competing nonspecific binding sites, and on the free concentrations of those sites. Although it is probable that genomic DNA is largely occluded by protein binding or by condensation in vivo, the actual extent to which the DNA is available to act as a competitor for specific binding (i.e. the effective concentration of nonspecific DNA) is not known. Because many regulatory interactions occur simultaneously in a cell, it is reasonable to expect that they will have evolved to function at equilibrium with a shared concentration of competing nonspecific DNA. This premise was the basis for this study. In vitro binding data were compiled for six regulatory proteins that function in E. coli, and used to calculate theoretical equilibrium binding distributions. The calculated distributions were used to evaluate the regulatory states of promoters according to models based on the equilibrium occupancies of regulatory sites. For four proteins whose DNA-binding affinities are modulated by ligand binding (CAP, lac repressor, trp repressor and araC), regulation was assessed as the extent to which the presence of the modulator could affect the occupancy by protein of the specific sites (e.g. the difference in equilibrium occupancy by CAP of CAP binding sites between conditions of high and low concentrations of CAP's affinity modulator, cAMP). For two proteins whose site affinities are not modulated by ligand binding (lambda repressor and lambda-cro), regulation was assessed by specific site occupancy at equilibrium. These regulation profiles were compared to determine whether a single concentration of nonspecific competing DNA is compatible with effective regulation as defined for all of the systems. For five of the six modeled systems (CAP, trp repressor, araC, lambda repressor and lambda-cro), a free nonspecific DNA concentration on the order of 10(-4) M base pairs is compatible with regulation based on equilibria of the protein-DNA interactions. The lac repressor-operator system is an exception to these results: as has been shown previously, the regulation of operator binding by low molecular weight inducers increases with increasing concentrations of nonspecific DNA (von Hippel et al., 1974 Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 4808-4812).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
大肠杆菌中的转录通常受特定基因调控蛋白结合的控制。这些蛋白与其特定DNA结合位点的结合发生在大量“非特异性”基因组DNA存在的情况下。因此,与特定DNA位点的结合取决于调控蛋白的浓度、其对特定和竞争性非特异性结合位点的亲和力,以及这些位点的游离浓度。尽管在体内基因组DNA很可能大部分被蛋白质结合或凝聚所遮蔽,但DNA可作为特异性结合竞争者的实际程度(即非特异性DNA的有效浓度)尚不清楚。由于细胞中许多调控相互作用同时发生,因此可以合理预期它们已经进化到在与共享的竞争性非特异性DNA浓度达到平衡的状态下发挥作用。这一前提是本研究的基础。收集了在大肠杆菌中起作用的六种调控蛋白的体外结合数据,并用于计算理论平衡结合分布。根据基于调控位点平衡占据情况的模型,利用计算出的分布来评估启动子的调控状态。对于四种其DNA结合亲和力受配体结合调节的蛋白(CAP、乳糖阻遏物、色氨酸阻遏物和阿拉伯糖操纵子蛋白),将调节评估为调节剂的存在能够影响蛋白对特定位点占据的程度(例如,在CAP亲和力调节剂cAMP高浓度和低浓度条件下,CAP结合位点上CAP平衡占据的差异)。对于两种其位点亲和力不受配体结合调节的蛋白(λ阻遏物和λ - cro蛋白),通过平衡时特定位点的占据情况来评估调节。比较这些调节图谱,以确定单一浓度的非特异性竞争DNA是否与所有系统所定义的有效调节兼容。对于六个建模系统中的五个(CAP、色氨酸阻遏物、阿拉伯糖操纵子蛋白、λ阻遏物和λ - cro蛋白),约10^(-4) M碱基对的游离非特异性DNA浓度与基于蛋白质 - DNA相互作用平衡的调节兼容。乳糖阻遏物 - 操纵基因系统是这些结果的一个例外:如先前所示,低分子量诱导剂对操纵基因结合的调节随着非特异性DNA浓度的增加而增加(冯·希佩尔等人,1974年,《美国国家科学院院刊》71卷,4808 - 4812页)。