Brown L, Karrison T, Cibils L A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;171(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70073-7.
Our purpose was to evaluate the outcome of deliveries with fetuses in breech presentation at labor and to compare the results by route of delivery. Specially reviewed were fetuses weighing > or = 1500 gm.
An observational study of consecutive cases of all singleton pregnancies and twin pregnancies with the first fetus presenting in breech delivered at Chicago Lying-In Hospital from July 1980 to December 1987 was performed. Crude perinatal mortality and effect of mode of delivery (cesarean vs vaginal) by weight were compared after correction for nonpreventable causes. A further correction was made for fetuses weighing > or = 1500 gm by excluding all cases of fetal distress from the cesarean section group. All clinically relevant factors were evaluated. Statistical methods included comparison of frequencies in the two groups by chi 2 and Fisher exact tests and comparison of means by two-sample t tests.
Of 21,380 deliveries, 843 (3.9%) presented by the breech. Forty-four percent were delivered vaginally; 8.4% were first twins. There were 51% preterm infants, and 24% had clinical distress. Crude perinatal mortality was 24%; 8% stillborns, 10% from prematurity, and 6% from other causes, including lethal congenital malformations. The corrected perinatal mortality was 15%. Vaginal deliveries had a higher 5-minute depression rate (32% vs 24%) and corrected perinatal mortality (23% vs 9.6%); however, fetal weights were significantly lower. There were no differences in outcomes for newborns weighing > or = 1500 gm by route of delivery; all five neonatal deaths in this subgroup occurred among the abdominal deliveries.
The very poor perinatal outcomes in breeches are primarily related to factors other than breech presentation. Route of delivery for infants weighing > or = 1500 gm does not influence neonatal outcome; thus cesarean section solely for breech presentation in this subgroup does not appear to be justified.
我们的目的是评估分娩时臀位胎儿的分娩结局,并比较不同分娩方式的结果。特别回顾了体重≥1500克的胎儿。
对1980年7月至1987年12月在芝加哥产科医院分娩的所有单胎妊娠及双胎妊娠中第一个胎儿为臀位的连续病例进行了观察性研究。在校正不可预防的原因后,比较了不同体重的粗围产期死亡率及分娩方式(剖宫产与阴道分娩)的影响。通过排除剖宫产组中所有胎儿窘迫病例,对体重≥1500克的胎儿进行了进一步校正。评估了所有临床相关因素。统计方法包括用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较两组的频率,并用两样本t检验比较均值。
在21380例分娩中,843例(3.9%)为臀位。44%经阴道分娩;8.4%为双胎中的第一个胎儿。51%为早产儿,24%有临床窘迫。粗围产期死亡率为24%;8%为死产,10%因早产,6%因其他原因,包括致命性先天性畸形。校正后的围产期死亡率为15%。阴道分娩的5分钟窒息率较高(32%对24%),校正后的围产期死亡率也较高(23%对9.6%);然而,胎儿体重明显较低。体重≥1500克的新生儿,不同分娩方式的结局无差异;该亚组中的5例新生儿死亡均发生在剖宫产分娩的婴儿中。
臀位围产期结局极差主要与臀位以外的因素有关。体重≥1500克婴儿的分娩方式不影响新生儿结局;因此,仅因臀位对该亚组进行剖宫产似乎不合理。