Stip E, Lecours A R, Chertkow H, Elie R, O'Connor K
Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Côte-des-Neiges, University of Montreal, Quebec.
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1994 May;19(3):202-7.
In cognitive science, lexical decision task is used to investigate visual word recognition and lexical access. The issue of whether or not individuals who are depressed differ in their access to affectively laden words and specifically to words that have negative affect was examined. Based on some aspects of the Resource Allocation Model (Ellis), it was postulated that patients suffering from depression take more time to recognize items from an affective-loaded list. In order to compare their behavior in a lexical decision task, patients suffering from depression and healthy controls were studied. We hoped to find an interaction between the mood state of subjects and the categories (affective or neutral) of words. Two groups of right-handed adults served as subjects in our experiment. The first group consisted of 11 patients suffering from depression (mean age: 40.2; sd: 6.8). All of this group met the DSM-III-R and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depressive disorder. Severity of their disease was rated using the 24-item Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale. All patients suffering from depression were without psychotropic medication. The control group was composed of 24 subjects (mean age: 32.7; sd: 7.9). A depressive word-list and a neutral word-list were built and a computer was used for the lexical-decision task. A longer reaction time to detect the non-word stimuli (F1,33 = 11.19, p < 0.01) was observed with the patients by comparison to the normal subjects. In the analysis of the word stimuli, a group by list interaction (F1,33 = 7.18, p < 0.01) was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在认知科学中,词汇判断任务用于研究视觉单词识别和词汇通达。研究探讨了抑郁症患者在获取带有情感色彩的词汇,特别是具有负面情感的词汇方面是否存在差异。基于资源分配模型(埃利斯)的某些方面,推测抑郁症患者识别情感负载列表中的项目需要更长时间。为了比较他们在词汇判断任务中的行为,对抑郁症患者和健康对照组进行了研究。我们希望找到受试者情绪状态与单词类别(情感或中性)之间的相互作用。两组右利手成年人作为我们实验的受试者。第一组由11名抑郁症患者组成(平均年龄:40.2;标准差:6.8)。该组所有患者均符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本以及重度抑郁症的研究诊断标准。使用24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表对他们的疾病严重程度进行评分。所有抑郁症患者均未服用精神药物。对照组由24名受试者组成(平均年龄:32.7;标准差:7.9)。构建了一个包含抑郁词汇的列表和一个中性词汇的列表,并使用计算机进行词汇判断任务。与正常受试者相比,观察到患者检测非单词刺激的反应时间更长(F1,33 = 11.19,p < 0.01)。在对单词刺激的分析中,发现了组与列表的相互作用(F1,33 = 7.18,p < 0.01)。(摘要截短至250字)