Bailey J, King N, Newton P
Department of General Practice, University of Manchester, Rusholme Health Centre, UK.
Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;11(1):9-14. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.9.
An analytical framework of the referral decision was applied to the question of whether general practitioners (GPs) with relatively high and relatively low referral rates differed in the types of factors that influenced their referral decisions. Interview data from six high referring and six low referring GPs were compared at all levels of the framework, using both quantitative and qualitative content analysis. High referrers were found to mention significantly more negative factors than low referrers, i.e. they referred 'in spite of' reasons against referral. In particular, they referred patients in spite of having doubts about treatment effectiveness. Low referrers mentioned factors related to interpersonal processes significantly more often than high referrers, for example, GP-patient communication as an influence. Possible interpretations of these findings are discussed.
一个转诊决策分析框架被应用于探讨转诊率相对较高和相对较低的全科医生(GP)在影响其转诊决策的因素类型上是否存在差异这一问题。使用定量和定性内容分析法,在该框架的各个层面比较了六位高转诊率和六位低转诊率全科医生的访谈数据。结果发现,高转诊率医生提及的负面因素显著多于低转诊率医生,也就是说,他们是“尽管”存在不利于转诊的因素仍进行转诊。特别是,他们在对治疗效果存疑的情况下仍转诊患者。低转诊率医生提及与人际过程相关因素的频率显著高于高转诊率医生,例如,全科医生与患者的沟通作为一种影响因素。文中讨论了这些研究结果的可能解释。