Kammer B, Brink J A, Knoefel W T, Mueller P R, Prien E L, Ferrucci J T
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Invest Radiol. 1994 Apr;29(4):454-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199404000-00012.
The authors assessed the potential of edetic acid (EDTA) preparations to dissolve the residue of calcified gallstones partially treated with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE).
Nineteen triplets (57 gallstones) were submitted to dissolution in EDTA, urea-EDTA, and an MTBE control for 48 hours after initial partial dissolution in MTBE for 24 hours. Results were compared with findings at specimen computed tomography and crystallographic analysis. All data were corrected for differences in stone size.
In all three treatment groups (EDTA, urea-EDTA, MTBE), almost identical dissolution outcomes were observed within each triplet. Most triplets that dissolved displayed a laminated or a core-calcification pattern and consisted primarily of cholesterol. Specimens that dissolved poorly in all three groups displayed dense calcifications or thick calcified rims and were classified as pigment stones.
Because no statistically significant differences in dissolution were found among the EDTA, urea-EDTA, and MTBE treatments, we conclude that EDTA preparations are not superior to the continued use of MTBE for dissolution of residue after initial MTBE treatment.
作者评估了依地酸(EDTA)制剂溶解经甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)部分处理的钙化胆结石残留物的潜力。
19组三联体结石(共57颗胆结石)在经MTBE初始部分溶解24小时后,分别置于EDTA、尿素-EDTA以及MTBE对照组中进行48小时的溶解处理。将结果与标本计算机断层扫描及晶体学分析结果进行比较。所有数据均针对结石大小差异进行了校正。
在所有三个治疗组(EDTA、尿素-EDTA、MTBE)中,每组三联体结石均观察到几乎相同的溶解结果。大多数溶解的三联体结石呈现分层或核心钙化模式,主要由胆固醇组成。在所有三组中溶解较差的标本显示出致密钙化或厚钙化边缘,被归类为色素结石。
由于在EDTA、尿素-EDTA和MTBE治疗之间未发现溶解方面的统计学显著差异,我们得出结论,对于初始MTBE治疗后的残留物溶解,EDTA制剂并不优于继续使用MTBE。