Blasco J M, Garin-Bastuji B, Marin C M, Gerbier G, Fanlo J, Jiménez de Bagués M P, Cau C
Department of Animal Health, SIA/DGA, Zaragoza, Spain.
Vet Rec. 1994 Apr 16;134(16):415-20. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.16.415.
Fifteen different Rose Bengal antigens showed large differences with respect to pH, cell concentration and agglutination with the international standard anti-Brucella abortus serum, demonstrating the lack of international standardisation. Their sensitivity and specificity, compared with that of the complement fixation test, were evaluated for the diagnosis of B melitensis infection in culture-positive sheep, brucella-free ewes, and sheep and goats belonging to field flocks under different epidemiological conditions. All the Rose Bengal antigens and the complement fixation test had 100 per cent specificity when testing brucella-free sheep or animals belonging to flocks in unvaccinated brucellosis-free areas, but there were large differences in sensitivity between the Rose Bengal antigens with sera from culture-positive sheep or from animals belonging to infected flocks. When using the most sensitive antigen, no difference was observed in Rose Bengal sensitivity between animals infected with either biovar 1 or biovar 3 of B melitensis. The relationship between the sensitivity of the Rose Bengal antigens and cell concentration was unclear, but their sensitivity was related to the standardisation of the antigens with the international standard serum. The complement fixation test was less sensitive than the Rose Bengal test when testing culture-positive sheep. When testing sera from animals belonging to infected flocks with antigens standardised according to European Union rules, no great differences were observed in the sensitivities of the two tests. However, great differences in sensitivity between the Rose Bengal antigens were observed with sera from animals belonging to flocks with low levels of prevalence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
15种不同的孟加拉玫瑰红抗原在pH值、细胞浓度以及与国际标准抗流产布鲁氏菌血清的凝集反应方面存在很大差异,这表明缺乏国际标准化。针对不同流行病学条件下培养阳性绵羊、无布鲁氏菌母羊以及野外羊群中的绵羊和山羊,评估了它们与补体结合试验相比,用于诊断羊布鲁氏菌感染的敏感性和特异性。在检测无布鲁氏菌的绵羊或未接种布鲁氏菌疫苗地区的羊群中的动物时,所有孟加拉玫瑰红抗原和补体结合试验的特异性均为100%,但孟加拉玫瑰红抗原与培养阳性绵羊或感染羊群中的动物血清之间的敏感性存在很大差异。使用最敏感的抗原时,感染羊布鲁氏菌生物变种1或生物变种3的动物在孟加拉玫瑰红敏感性方面未观察到差异。孟加拉玫瑰红抗原的敏感性与细胞浓度之间的关系尚不清楚,但其敏感性与抗原用国际标准血清的标准化有关。在检测培养阳性绵羊时,补体结合试验的敏感性低于孟加拉玫瑰红试验。用根据欧盟规则标准化的抗原检测感染羊群中的动物血清时,两种试验的敏感性未观察到很大差异。然而,在患病率较低的羊群中的动物血清中,观察到孟加拉玫瑰红抗原之间的敏感性存在很大差异。(摘要截短至250字)