Suppr超能文献

一种新的儿童虐待与忽视回顾性测量方法的初始信度和效度

Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect.

作者信息

Bernstein D P, Fink L, Handelsman L, Foote J, Lovejoy M, Wenzel K, Sapareto E, Ruggiero J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;151(8):1132-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.8.1132.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This report presents initial findings on the reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.

METHOD

Two hundred eighty-six drug- or alcohol-dependent patients were given the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire as part of a larger test battery, and 40 of these patients were given the questionnaire again after an interval of 2 to 6 months. Sixty-eight of the patients were also given a structured interview for child abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Interview, that was developed by the authors.

RESULTS

Principal-components analysis of responses on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire yielded four rotated orthogonal factors: physical and emotional abuse, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, and physical neglect. Cronbach's alpha for the factors ranged from 0.79 to 0.94, indicating high internal consistency. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire also demonstrated good test-retest reliability over a 2- to 6-month interval (intraclass correlation = 0.88), as well as convergence with the Childhood Trauma Interview, indicating that patients' reports of child abuse and neglect based on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire were highly stable, both over time and across type of instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide strong initial support for the reliability and validity of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.

摘要

目的

本报告介绍了一种新的儿童虐待与忽视回顾性测量工具——儿童创伤问卷的信度和效度的初步研究结果。

方法

286名药物或酒精依赖患者接受了儿童创伤问卷测试,该问卷是一个更大测试组合的一部分,其中40名患者在间隔2至6个月后再次接受了该问卷测试。68名患者还接受了作者开发的关于儿童虐待与忽视的结构化访谈——儿童创伤访谈。

结果

对儿童创伤问卷的回答进行主成分分析得出四个旋转后的正交因子:身体和情感虐待、情感忽视、性虐待和身体忽视。各因子的克朗巴哈系数在0.79至0.94之间,表明内部一致性较高。儿童创伤问卷在2至6个月的间隔内也显示出良好的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.88),并且与儿童创伤访谈结果具有一致性,这表明基于儿童创伤问卷的患者对儿童虐待与忽视的报告在时间上和不同类型工具之间都高度稳定。

结论

这些发现为儿童创伤问卷的信度和效度提供了有力的初步支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验