Bernstein D P, Fink L, Handelsman L, Foote J, Lovejoy M, Wenzel K, Sapareto E, Ruggiero J
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;151(8):1132-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.8.1132.
This report presents initial findings on the reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.
Two hundred eighty-six drug- or alcohol-dependent patients were given the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire as part of a larger test battery, and 40 of these patients were given the questionnaire again after an interval of 2 to 6 months. Sixty-eight of the patients were also given a structured interview for child abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Interview, that was developed by the authors.
Principal-components analysis of responses on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire yielded four rotated orthogonal factors: physical and emotional abuse, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, and physical neglect. Cronbach's alpha for the factors ranged from 0.79 to 0.94, indicating high internal consistency. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire also demonstrated good test-retest reliability over a 2- to 6-month interval (intraclass correlation = 0.88), as well as convergence with the Childhood Trauma Interview, indicating that patients' reports of child abuse and neglect based on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire were highly stable, both over time and across type of instruments.
These findings provide strong initial support for the reliability and validity of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.
本报告介绍了一种新的儿童虐待与忽视回顾性测量工具——儿童创伤问卷的信度和效度的初步研究结果。
286名药物或酒精依赖患者接受了儿童创伤问卷测试,该问卷是一个更大测试组合的一部分,其中40名患者在间隔2至6个月后再次接受了该问卷测试。68名患者还接受了作者开发的关于儿童虐待与忽视的结构化访谈——儿童创伤访谈。
对儿童创伤问卷的回答进行主成分分析得出四个旋转后的正交因子:身体和情感虐待、情感忽视、性虐待和身体忽视。各因子的克朗巴哈系数在0.79至0.94之间,表明内部一致性较高。儿童创伤问卷在2至6个月的间隔内也显示出良好的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.88),并且与儿童创伤访谈结果具有一致性,这表明基于儿童创伤问卷的患者对儿童虐待与忽视的报告在时间上和不同类型工具之间都高度稳定。
这些发现为儿童创伤问卷的信度和效度提供了有力的初步支持。