Chen C H
School of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical College, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1994 May;10(5):229-38.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether the postpartum depression model fits the data. A total of 129 Chinese women at 6 weeks postpartum were recruited to participate in this study from the Kaohsiung City area, Taiwan, Republic of China. Five instruments were used to collect data: the Demographic Data Form, the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, the Cohen's Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, the Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory. In testing the postpartum depression model, tests of covariance structures for type of delivery (vaginal delivery vs. Cesarean delivery) by LISREL (LInear Structural RELations) indicated that covariance matrices for the two groups were significantly different. Therefore, multi-sample LISREL analysis was used to analyze data from the two groups simultaneously and it demonstrated that the basic model of the two groups fit the data well. In all, 54% of variance in postpartum depression for the vaginal delivery group and 44% of variance in postpartum depression for the Cesarean delivery group was explained.
本研究的目的是检验产后抑郁模型是否符合数据。总共从中国台湾高雄市地区招募了129名产后6周的中国女性参与本研究。使用了五种工具来收集数据：人口统计学数据表、科恩感知压力量表、科恩人际支持评估量表、库珀史密斯自尊量表和贝克抑郁量表。在检验产后抑郁模型时，通过LISREL（线性结构关系）对分娩类型（顺产与剖宫产）的协方差结构进行检验，结果表明两组的协方差矩阵存在显著差异。因此，使用多样本LISREL分析同时分析两组数据，结果表明两组的基本模型与数据拟合良好。顺产组产后抑郁的方差中有54%得到了解释，剖宫产组产后抑郁的方差中有44%得到了解释。
