Patrux B, Laissy J P, Jouini S, Kawiecki W, Coty P, Thiébot J
Neuroradiology, CHU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.
Neuroradiology. 1994 Apr;36(3):193-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00588129.
We prospectively correlated the findings of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with those of transfemoral four-vessel angiography in 54 patients to investigate the direction of flow within the circle of Willis. Our primary goal was to assess the direction of flow using the size of the vessel and signal intensity, without saturation techniques. Analysis of the circle of Willis, especially the communicating arteries, was performed double-blind by two groups of two radiologists. Three types of arteries were identified: high flow or cross-cerebral circulation, patent and nonvisualised arteries. Cerebral angiography was the standard for comparison between the two methods. MRA did not reveal any arteries invisible on angiography, thus providing a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of MRA was 89.2% for the anterior and 81.3% for the posterior communicating arteries, and 100% for the anterior, middle and posterior cerebral arteries. MRA was shown to be a useful technique for the assessment of patency of the circle of Willis.
我们前瞻性地将54例患者的磁共振血管造影(MRA)结果与经股四血管造影结果进行了对比,以研究 Willis 环内的血流方向。我们的主要目标是在不使用饱和技术的情况下,利用血管大小和信号强度评估血流方向。由两组各两名放射科医生对 Willis 环,尤其是交通动脉进行双盲分析。确定了三种类型的动脉:高流量或跨脑循环、通畅和未显影的动脉。脑血管造影是两种方法之间进行比较的标准。MRA 未显示任何在血管造影上不可见的动脉,因此特异性为100%。MRA 对前交通动脉的敏感性为89.2%,对后交通动脉的敏感性为81.3%,对大脑前、中、后动脉的敏感性为100%。MRA 被证明是评估 Willis 环通畅性的一种有用技术。