Suppr超能文献

氯化米库氯铵的起效时间。拇收肌与眼轮匝肌神经肌肉阻滞监测的比较。

Onset of action of mivacurium chloride. A comparison of neuromuscular blockade monitoring at the adductor pollicis and the orbicularis oculi.

作者信息

Sayson S C, Mongan P D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6200.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1994 Jul;81(1):35-42.

PMID:8042808
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal site for monitoring neuromuscular blockade for intubations facilitated with mivacurium chloride has not been established. The primary purpose of this evaluation was to determine the difference in onset of neuromuscular blockade between the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis in patients administered mivacurium chloride. We also evaluated intubating conditions when intubation was timed to maximal neuromuscular blockade at either the orbicularis oculi or the adductor pollicis. The results for patients administered mivacurium chloride were compared with those for a control group administered succinylcholine.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized design, the time to loss of the compound muscle action potential at the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis was monitored in 20 patients administered mivacurium chloride and ten patients administered succinylcholine. After administration of mivacurium chloride (0.15 mg.kg-1), ten patients underwent tracheal intubation at maximal depression of the orbicularis oculi (group 2) and ten patients at maximal depression of the adductor pollicis (group 3). In an additional ten patients the trachea was intubated 60 s after administration of succinylcholine (1 mg.kg-1) (group 1, control). Intubation and evaluation of conditions was performed by one investigator blinded to patient treatments.

RESULTS

Loss of compound muscle action potential at the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis was more rapid in group 1, and intubation was completed at 86 +/- 26 s. In the patients administered mivacurium chloride, the orbicularis oculi compound muscle action potential was lost 3 min earlier than the adductor pollicis compound muscle action potential. Subsequently, intubation was completed at 134 +/- 50 s in the orbicularis oculi group, whereas the time to intubation was 321 +/- 57 s in the adductor pollicis group. There was no significant differences in intubation conditions between the mivacurium chloride groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When monitoring 95% twitch height depression of the orbicularis oculi muscle, intubation can be accomplished in approximately 2 min after administration of mivacurium chloride (0.15 mg.kg-1). Because intubating conditions were comparable to the patients administered succinylcholine or intubated during monitoring of the twitch height depression of the adductor pollicis, we believe that optimal site for monitoring during intubation using mivacurium chloride is the orbicularis oculi muscle.

摘要

背景

使用氯化米库氯铵辅助插管时,监测神经肌肉阻滞的最佳部位尚未确定。本评估的主要目的是确定给予氯化米库氯铵的患者眼轮匝肌和拇内收肌之间神经肌肉阻滞起效时间的差异。我们还评估了在眼轮匝肌或拇内收肌达到最大神经肌肉阻滞时进行插管的插管条件。将给予氯化米库氯铵患者的结果与给予琥珀酰胆碱的对照组结果进行比较。

方法

采用双盲随机设计,监测20例给予氯化米库氯铵的患者和10例给予琥珀酰胆碱的患者眼轮匝肌和拇内收肌复合肌肉动作电位消失的时间。给予氯化米库氯铵(0.15mg·kg-1)后,10例患者在眼轮匝肌最大抑制时进行气管插管(2组),10例患者在拇内收肌最大抑制时进行气管插管(3组)。另外10例患者在给予琥珀酰胆碱(1mg·kg-1)后60秒进行气管插管(1组,对照组)。插管和条件评估由一名对患者治疗不知情的研究人员进行。

结果

1组眼轮匝肌和拇内收肌复合肌肉动作电位消失更快,插管在86±26秒完成。在给予氯化米库氯铵的患者中,眼轮匝肌复合肌肉动作电位比拇内收肌复合肌肉动作电位提前3分钟消失。随后,眼轮匝肌组插管在134±50秒完成,而拇内收肌组插管时间为321±57秒。氯化米库氯铵组之间的插管条件没有显著差异。

结论

监测眼轮匝肌95%颤搐高度抑制时,给予氯化米库氯铵(0.15mg·kg-1)后约2分钟可完成插管。由于插管条件与给予琥珀酰胆碱的患者或在拇内收肌颤搐高度抑制监测期间插管的患者相当,我们认为使用氯化米库氯铵插管期间监测的最佳部位是眼轮匝肌。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验