Suppr超能文献

比较全身麻醉期间使用米库氯铵时在上臂(TOF 袖带®)和眼睑(TOF 扫描®)测量神经肌肉阻滞的差异。

Comparing Neuromuscular Blockade Measurement Between Upper Arm (TOF Cuff®) and Eyelid (TOF Scan®) Using Mivacurium during General Anesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2024 May 2;30:e943630. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943630.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mivacurium is a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent. TOF-Cuff® is a device that monitors intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure. TOF-Scan® measures muscle relaxation status of an anaesthetized patient. This study included 36 patients aged 18 to 75 years presenting for elective surgery, to compare neuromuscular blockade measured using the TOF-Cuff of the upper arm and the TOF-Scan of the facial corrugator supercilii muscle during general anesthesia and following administration of mivacurium. MATERIAL AND METHODS Train-of-four (TOF) values were obtained every 30 s before intubation and successively every 5 min until extubation. RESULTS The median onset time for TOF-Cuff was longer than for TOF-Scan (210 s vs 90 s, P<0.00001). Multiplying the time to relaxation (according to TOF-Scan) by 1 to 8, respectively, provided concordance with the TOF-Cuff result for the following cumulative percentages of patients: 5.5%, 38.9%, 58.3%, 77.8%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. Analogue values for time to recovery from the last dose were 11.1%, 63.9%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 86.1%, 88.9%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. The proportion of patients who still had TOFratio=0 in the assessment performed at min 15 did not differ significantly between these 2 methods (P=0.088). Both TOF-Scan and TOF-Cuff showed a false-negative result in patients with clinical symptoms of preterm recovery; the numerical difference favored TOF-Cuff (1.6% vs 2.1%) but without statistical significance (P=0.2235). CONCLUSIONS When measurement on the limb is not possible, TOF-Scan on the eyelid can be an alternative for TOF-Cuff on the upper arm, if the time to relaxation is multiplied by at least 8, which is enough for 90% of patients.

摘要

背景

米库氯铵是非去极化型神经肌肉阻滞剂。TOF-Cuff®是一种监测术中神经肌肉阻滞和血压的设备。TOF-Scan®测量麻醉患者的肌肉松弛状态。本研究纳入了 36 名年龄在 18 至 75 岁之间的择期手术患者,比较了全身麻醉期间和米库氯铵给药后使用上臂 TOF-Cuff 和面部皱眉肌 TOF-Scan 测量的神经肌肉阻滞情况。

材料和方法

在插管前每隔 30 秒获取四个成串刺激(TOF)值,然后每隔 5 分钟连续获取,直到拔管。

结果

TOF-Cuff 的起始时间中位数长于 TOF-Scan(210 秒比 90 秒,P<0.00001)。根据 TOF-Scan 将松弛时间分别乘以 1 至 8,可以得到与 TOF-Cuff 结果一致的结果,对于以下患者百分比:5.5%、38.9%、58.3%、77.8%、83.3%、86.1%、88.9%和 91.7%。从最后一次剂量恢复的模拟时间值为 11.1%、63.9%、83.3%、86.1%、86.1%、88.9%、88.9%和 91.7%。在评估 min 15 时,两种方法的 TOFratio=0 患者比例无显著差异(P=0.088)。TOF-Scan 和 TOF-Cuff 在有预期末期恢复临床症状的患者中均出现假阴性结果;数值差异有利于 TOF-Cuff(1.6%比 2.1%),但无统计学意义(P=0.2235)。

结论

如果将松弛时间乘以至少 8,则当无法进行肢体测量时,眼睑上的 TOF-Scan 可以替代上臂上的 TOF-Cuff,这对于 90%的患者来说已经足够。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3a/11075572/f0a0ecc37213/medscimonit-30-e943630-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验