• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型现场研究中利用审查工具的可靠性

Reliability of a utilization review instrument in a large field study.

作者信息

Booth B M, Ludke R L, Fisher E M

机构信息

HSR&D Field Program (152/NLR) VA Medical Center, North Little Rock, AR 72114.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 1994 Summer;9(2):68-73. doi: 10.1177/0885713X9400900205.

DOI:10.1177/0885713X9400900205
PMID:8044054
Abstract

One important question for a utilization management program is whether the utilization review instrument is consistent or stable when used on many occasions by the same abstractor (intrarater reliability) or by several abstractors (inter-rater reliability). As part of a nationwide study of inappropriate utilization of inpatient services by the Department of Veterans Affairs, we conducted a thorough investigation of the inter-rater reliability of a widely used utilization review instrument by 27 nurse abstractors. All abstractors were extensively trained, both by the developers of the instrument and by use of practice medical records. A standard protocol for resolving questions was implemented, with immediate communication of decisions to abstractors. The results of three reliability assessments, conducted immediately after formal training, after several weeks of reviewing practice records, and midway through review of the study records, demonstrated good to excellent reliability, both when comparing the nurse abstractors with a physician gold standard and among themselves. Therefore, with appropriate training and monitoring, utilization management programs in large hospitals, multihospital systems, and other health care organizations needing to examine inpatient utilization should feel confident that they can achieve reviews that would be in close agreement with physician and other nurse abstractors. Such confidence should increase the acceptability of utilization management programs.

摘要

对于利用管理计划而言,一个重要问题是,当同一名提取员多次使用(提取员内部信度)或多名提取员使用(提取员间信度)时,利用审查工具是否具有一致性或稳定性。作为退伍军人事务部对住院服务不当利用情况进行的一项全国性研究的一部分,我们对27名护士提取员使用的一种广泛应用的利用审查工具的提取员间信度进行了全面调查。所有提取员都接受了该工具开发者以及通过使用实际病历进行的广泛培训。实施了一个解决问题的标准方案,并将决定立即传达给提取员。在正式培训后、经过几周的实际病历审查后以及在研究病历审查进行到一半时进行的三项信度评估结果表明,无论是将护士提取员与医生金标准进行比较,还是提取员之间相互比较,信度都良好到优秀。因此,通过适当的培训和监测,大型医院、多医院系统以及其他需要审查住院利用情况的医疗保健组织中的利用管理计划应该有信心,它们能够实现与医生和其他护士提取员高度一致的审查。这种信心应该会提高利用管理计划的可接受性。

相似文献

1
Reliability of a utilization review instrument in a large field study.大型现场研究中利用审查工具的可靠性
Am J Med Qual. 1994 Summer;9(2):68-73. doi: 10.1177/0885713X9400900205.
2
Inter-rater reliability testing for utilization management staff.利用管理工作人员的评分者间信度测试。
Manag Care. 2001 Jun;10(6):49-50, 53-9.
3
[Reproducibility of a German scale for assessing the need for inpatient treatment in surgery].[一种用于评估外科住院治疗需求的德国量表的可重复性]
Soz Praventivmed. 2000;45(6):258-66. doi: 10.1007/BF01591688.
4
Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.利用审查标准的可靠性和有效性。适宜性评估方案、标准化医学审查工具和强度-严重程度-出院标准。
Med Care. 1990 Feb;28(2):95-111. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199002000-00001.
5
Medical record review conduction model for improving interrater reliability of abstracting medical-related information.用于提高医学相关信息提取者间可靠性的病历审查传导模型。
Eval Health Prof. 2009 Sep;32(3):281-98. doi: 10.1177/0163278709338561. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
6
Use of volunteer student abstractors for a retrospective cohort analysis: a study of inter-rater reliability.利用志愿学生文摘员进行回顾性队列分析:一项评价评分者间可靠性的研究。
Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):552-6; discussion 556. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.021.
7
Inter-rater Reliability of the Diamond & Forrester Score in Emergency Department Chest Pain Observation Unit Patients.急诊科胸痛观察病房患者中钻石与弗雷斯特评分的评分者间信度
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Dec;14(4):154-6. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000056.
8
Liability and validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in Turkey.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Aug;12(4):325-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.4.325.
9
Relationship between inappropriate admissions and days of care: implications for utilization management.不适当入院与护理天数之间的关系:对利用管理的影响。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1991 Fall;36(3):421-37.
10
The reliability and validity of the pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol.儿童适宜性评估方案的可靠性和有效性。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Mar;15(3):77-80. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30269-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction in inappropriate hospital use based on analysis of the causes.基于原因分析的不合理医院使用减少。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 17;12:361. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-361.