• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预约服务:计划对一个复杂问题进行基准测试。

Appointment access: planning to benchmark a complex issue.

作者信息

Lewis A V, White J, Davis B

机构信息

Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena 91188.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 May;20(5):285-93. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30073-6.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30073-6
PMID:8044224
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kaiser Permanente-Southern California Region carried out an external benchmarking project to improve appointment access. This article provides practical guidelines for planning a benchmark project around a complex issue such as appointment access.

METHOD

Before conducting external site visits, team members determined the goals of the project, defined internal processes, and identified 16 key elements of access (or those factors important to member satisfaction with appointment access). Once a questionnaire was finalized, external benchmark partners were identified and on-site visits conducted.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the on-site visits, team members identified innovative and best practices for each of the 16 key elements of access. Based on these recommendations, some improvements were made across the Southern California region, such as the elimination of provisional booking. Reports of the results have also been sent to Kaiser Permanente medical centers in the region and across the country. Each medical center is encouraged to use these results to internally improve its own appointment access.

摘要

背景

南加州永久医疗集团开展了一项外部基准评估项目,以改善预约服务。本文为围绕预约服务等复杂问题规划基准项目提供实用指南。

方法

在进行外部实地考察之前,团队成员确定了项目目标,明确了内部流程,并确定了16个预约服务的关键要素(或那些对会员预约服务满意度至关重要的因素)。问卷最终确定后,确定了外部基准合作伙伴并进行了实地考察。

结论

基于实地考察,团队成员为16个预约服务关键要素中的每一个都确定了创新做法和最佳实践。根据这些建议,南加州地区进行了一些改进,比如取消临时预约。结果报告也已发送给该地区及全国的永久医疗集团医疗中心。鼓励每个医疗中心利用这些结果在内部改善自身的预约服务。

相似文献

1
Appointment access: planning to benchmark a complex issue.预约服务:计划对一个复杂问题进行基准测试。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 May;20(5):285-93. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30073-6.
2
Benchmarking in health care: turning challenges into success.医疗保健中的基准评估:将挑战转化为成功。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 May;20(5):277-84. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30072-4.
3
Impact of same-day appointments on patient satisfaction with general practice appointment systems.当日预约对患者对全科医疗预约系统满意度的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Sep;58(554):641-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X330780.
4
Improving outpatient appointment access--lessons learned.改善门诊预约服务——经验教训
Ambul Outreach. 1997 Winter:10-2.
5
Does Advanced Access improve access to primary health care? Questionnaire survey of patients.“快速通道”能否改善初级卫生保健服务的可及性?患者问卷调查
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Aug;57(541):615-21.
6
Primary care access improvement: an empowerment-interaction model.初级保健可及性改善:一种赋权-互动模式。
Mil Med. 2000 May;165(5):390-5.
7
System profile. UniHealth America, Burbank, California.系统简介。美国联合健康集团,加利福尼亚州伯班克市。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993 Oct;5(8):19-21.
8
Clinical benchmarking improves clinical paths: experience with coronary artery bypass grafting.临床基准评估改善临床路径:冠状动脉搭桥手术的经验
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 May;20(5):267-76. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30071-2.
9
Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment.获得全科医生服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Oct;56(531):743-8.
10
System profile. Sutter Health, Sacramento, California.系统简介。萨特健康医疗集团,加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993 Oct;5(8):16-8.