Suppr超能文献

处理不可发音和可发音字母三字母组时的半球不对称性。

Hemispheric asymmetry for processing unpronounceable and pronounceable letter trigrams.

作者信息

Eng T L, Hellige J B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1061.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1994 May;46(4):517-35. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1029.

Abstract

In each of two experiments, observers attempted to identify three-letter strings presented briefly to the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH), to the right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH), or to both visual fields (and hemispheres) simultaneously (redundant BILATERAL trials). Similar visual half-field effects were obtained for both all-consonant (CCC) strings and consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) nonwords. For both types of strings, there were fewer errors on RVF/LH trials than on LVF/RH trials and the pattern of error types was qualitatively different for the two visual fields. The similarity of visual half-field results for CCC and CVC strings indicates that results that have been reported in earlier studies with CVC strings are not restricted to letter strings that can be coded as a single pronounceable syllable, as some have suggested. Instead, the results are consistent with hypotheses about hemispheric differences in the ability to encode and remember individual letters in a multielement display. In addition, for both CCC and CVC letter strings there were fewer errors on redundant BILATERAL trials than on either type of unilateral trial, suggesting interhemispheric collaboration in both cases. However, the qualitative error patterns obtained on redundant BILATERAL trials suggest that the precise way in which the hemispheres collaborate differs with the type of letter string.

摘要

在两项实验中,观察者试图识别短暂呈现于左视野/右半球(LVF/RH)、右视野/左半球(RVF/LH)或同时呈现于两个视野(及半球)(冗余双侧试验)的三个字母的字符串。对于全辅音(CCC)字符串和辅音-元音-辅音(CVC)非单词,都获得了类似的视觉半视野效应。对于这两种类型的字符串,RVF/LH试验中的错误比LVF/RH试验中的少,并且两个视野的错误类型模式在性质上有所不同。CCC和CVC字符串的视觉半视野结果的相似性表明,早期关于CVC字符串的研究中所报告的结果并不局限于可以编码为单个可发音音节的字母字符串,正如一些人所建议的那样。相反,这些结果与关于半球在多元素显示中编码和记忆单个字母能力差异的假设一致。此外,对于CCC和CVC字母字符串,冗余双侧试验中的错误都比任何一种单侧试验中的少,这表明在这两种情况下半球间都存在协作。然而,在冗余双侧试验中获得的定性错误模式表明,半球协作的精确方式因字母字符串的类型而异。

相似文献

3
Hemispheric differences in processing handwritten cursive.处理手写草书时的半球差异。
Brain Lang. 2007 Sep;102(3):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验