• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparative trial of magnesium citrate (Citramag) and Picolax for barium enema bowel preparation.

作者信息

Swarbrick M J, Collins M C, Moore D J, McBride K D

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1994 Jun;49(6):379-81. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81821-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81821-5
PMID:8045060
Abstract

It has previously been suggested that a single dose of magnesium citrate produces adequate cleansing of the bowel for barium enema examination. To determine whether such a regimen has any advantage over the widely used two doses of Picolax, a prospective randomized blinded trial was performed with over 100 patients allocated to each of the bowel preparation regimens. Radiographs were assessed for quality of mucosal coating, faecal residue and overall quality of bowel preparation. Patient compliance was good with both regimens. Normal daily activities were inconvenienced significantly more by the Picolax (P < 0.001), whereas the magnesium citrate (Citramag) caused more interruption of sleep (P < 0.01). Mucosal coating was similar with both regimens. There was more faecal residue and poorer overall bowel preparation with Citramag (P < 0.001), although diagnostic accuracy was only infrequently felt to be compromised as a result. Citramag may offer an alternative to Picolax in patients where minimal disruption to daily activities is desirable and where the detection of polyps is not critical.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparative trial of magnesium citrate (Citramag) and Picolax for barium enema bowel preparation.
Clin Radiol. 1994 Jun;49(6):379-81. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81821-5.
2
Preparation of the colon for double-contrast barium enema: comparison of Picolax, Picolax with cleansing enema and Citramag (2 sachets)--a randomized prospective trial.结肠双对比钡灌肠的肠道准备:聚乙二醇电解质散、聚乙二醇电解质散联合清洁灌肠与枸橼酸镁(2袋)的比较——一项随机前瞻性试验
Clin Radiol. 1994 Aug;49(8):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82939-3.
3
Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:用作结肠清洁剂的综述
Drugs. 2009;69(1):123-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00009.
4
The effect of oral magnesium-containing bowel preparation agents on mucosal coating by barium sulphate suspensions.
Br J Radiol. 1987 Dec;60(720):1215-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-720-1215.
5
A comparison of Fleet Phospho-soda with Picolax in the preparation of the colon for double contrast barium enema.磷酸钠盐灌肠剂与聚乙二醇电解质散剂用于结肠双重对比钡灌肠检查前肠道准备的比较。
Clin Radiol. 1998 Aug;53(8):612-4. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(98)80156-6.
6
Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax.
Clin Radiol. 2003 Sep;58(9):723-32. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00187-9.
7
Combinations of laxatives for bowel preparation: are they necessary?用于肠道准备的泻药组合:它们有必要吗?
Clin Radiol. 1984 Nov;35(6):461-2. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(84)80053-7.
8
A blinded prospective trial of low-residue versus normal diet in preparation for barium enema.一项关于低渣饮食与正常饮食用于钡剂灌肠准备的前瞻性双盲试验。
Br J Radiol. 1995 Feb;68(806):128-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-806-128.
9
A new oral bowel evacuant (Picolax) for colon cleansing.一种用于结肠清洁的新型口服肠道灌洗剂(聚乙二醇电解质散)。
Clin Radiol. 1983 Jan;34(1):75-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(83)80387-0.
10
A blinded clinical trial comparing conventional cleansing enema, Pico-salax and Golytely for barium enema bowel preparation.一项比较传统清洁灌肠剂、聚乙二醇电解质散和复方聚乙二醇电解质散用于钡剂灌肠肠道准备的双盲临床试验。
Clin Radiol. 1996 Aug;51(8):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80137-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:用作结肠清洁剂的综述
Drugs. 2009;69(1):123-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00009.