Bjorklund D F, Schneider W, Cassel W S, Ashley E
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton 33431.
Child Dev. 1994 Jun;65(3):951-65.
143 9- and 10-year-old children were classified into high- and low-IQ groups and given 4 different sort/recall lists (baseline, training, near [immediate] extension, far [1-week] extension) to assess training and extension of an organizational memory strategy. All children received categorized items of moderate typicality for Phases 1, 3, and 4. For Phase 2, children were assigned to either a training or control group, with half of the children in each group receiving category typical items and the others category atypical items. Levels of recall, sorting, and clustering were greater in Phase 2 for high-IQ children, for the typical lists, and for trained children. Both the high- and low-IQ children trained with typical items continued to show high levels of recall on the near extension phase. No group of subjects maintained high levels of recall after 1 week, although levels of sorting and/or clustering on the extension trials remained high for all groups of subjects except the low-IQ control children. This latter pattern (elevated sorting/clustering with low levels of recall) is an indication of a utilization deficiency, a phase in strategy development when children use a strategy but gain little or no benefit in performance. The results provide evidence for IQ, training, and material effects in the demonstration of a utilization deficiency.
143名9岁和10岁的儿童被分为高智商组和低智商组,并被给予4种不同的分类/回忆列表(基线、训练、近期[即时]扩展、远期[1周]扩展),以评估一种组织记忆策略的训练和扩展情况。在第1、3和4阶段,所有儿童都收到了具有中等典型性的分类项目。在第2阶段,儿童被分配到训练组或对照组,每组中有一半儿童收到典型类别项目,另一半儿童收到非典型类别项目。在第2阶段,高智商儿童、对于典型列表以及接受训练的儿童,其回忆、分类和聚类水平更高。接受典型项目训练的高智商和低智商儿童在近期扩展阶段继续表现出较高的回忆水平。尽管除低智商对照组儿童外,所有受试组在扩展试验中的分类和/或聚类水平仍然很高,但没有一组受试者在1周后仍保持较高的回忆水平。后一种模式(分类/聚类水平升高但回忆水平较低)表明存在运用缺陷,这是策略发展中的一个阶段,即儿童使用了一种策略,但在表现上几乎没有或没有获得益处。这些结果为智商、训练和材料在运用缺陷表现方面的影响提供了证据。