Suppr超能文献

老年初级保健患者抑郁与医疗服务利用的纵向研究。

Longitudinal study of depression and health services use among elderly primary care patients.

作者信息

Callahan C M, Hui S L, Nienaber N A, Musick B S, Tierney W M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Aug;42(8):833-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06554.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and 9-month incidence of depressive symptoms among a cohort of elderly primary care patients and to determine whether different patterns of depression are associated with different patterns of health services use.

DESIGN

Prospective study of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale and identification of patients' outpatient health services use through an electronic medical record system.

SETTING

An academic primary care group practice at an urban ambulatory care clinic.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 1711 patients aged 60 and older who completed the CES-D at baseline and 9 months later; 935 of these patients also completed the CES-D at 6 months.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

The prevalence of significant symptoms of depression (CES-D > or = 16) was 17.1% at baseline and 18.8% at 9 months; 26.8% of patients exceeded the threshold on the CES-D either at baseline or 9 months, and the 9-month incidence was 11.7%. Among the patients re-interviewed at both 6 and 9 months, the 6-month incidence was 12%, and the incidence between the 6- and 9-month assessments was 10%. Of the 292 patients with depression at baseline, 140 (47.6%) remained depressed at the 9-month follow-up. Baseline and 6-month CES-D score, in addition to perceived health at 6 months, explained 45% of the variance in the 9-month CES-D score. Patients above the threshold on the CES-D at any time were more likely to rate their health as fair or poor (69.8% vs 43.7%) and more likely to have an emergency room visit (40.4% vs 29.4%). These patients also had 38% more outpatient visits (7.7 vs 5.6) and 61% higher total outpatient charges ($1209 vs $751) than patients who never exceeded the CES-D threshold over the 9-month window (all P values < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms were frequent and often persistent in this patient population. We identified patterns of oscillating severity of symptoms within individuals but relatively stable incidence and prevalence rates over a 9-month period. Patients who exceeded the threshold on the CES-D at any time during the study had significantly greater health services use and poorer perceived health.

摘要

目的

描述一组老年初级保健患者中抑郁症状的患病率及9个月发病率,并确定不同的抑郁模式是否与不同的卫生服务利用模式相关。

设计

采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)对抑郁症状进行前瞻性研究,并通过电子病历系统识别患者的门诊卫生服务利用情况。

地点

城市门诊护理诊所的一个学术性初级保健团体诊所。

患者/参与者:1711名60岁及以上的患者,他们在基线时和9个月后完成了CES-D量表;其中935名患者在6个月时也完成了CES-D量表。

测量与主要结果

抑郁显著症状(CES-D≥16)的患病率在基线时为17.1%,9个月时为18.8%;26.8%的患者在基线或9个月时超过了CES-D阈值,9个月发病率为11.7%。在6个月和9个月时均接受重新访谈的患者中,6个月发病率为12%,6至9个月评估期间的发病率为10%。在基线时患有抑郁症的292名患者中,140名(47.6%)在9个月随访时仍患有抑郁症。基线和6个月时的CES-D评分,以及6个月时的自我感知健康状况,解释了9个月时CES-D评分中45%的变异。在任何时候CES-D超过阈值的患者更有可能将自己的健康状况评为一般或较差(69.8%对43.%-),更有可能去急诊室就诊(40.4%对29.4%)。与在9个月期间从未超过CES-D阈值的患者相比,这些患者的门诊就诊次数多38%(7.7次对5.6次),门诊总费用高61%(1209美元对751美元)(所有P值<0.01)。

结论

在该患者群体中,抑郁症状很常见且往往持续存在。我们发现个体症状严重程度呈波动模式,但在9个月期间发病率和患病率相对稳定。在研究期间任何时候CES-D超过阈值的患者卫生服务利用显著增加,自我感知健康状况较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验