Callahan C M, Kesterson J G, Tierney W M
Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2859, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Mar 15;126(6):426-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-6-199703150-00002.
Previous studies have documented greater use of health services by depressed persons and have postulated that health care costs could be reduced overall through better recognition and treatment of depression.
To determine whether a greater burden of medical illness contributes to excess charges for diagnostic tests among older adults with symptoms of depression.
Prospective cohort study.
A primary care group practice at an academic institution.
3767 patients 60 years of age and older who completed testing on the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) during routine office visits.
Charges for all inpatient and ambulatory diagnostic testing for 2 years, including clinical pathology, diagnostic imaging, and special procedures; number of visits to the ambulatory care center or emergency department; and number of hospitalizations. The Ambulatory Care Group case-mix approach, which is based on ambulatory diagnoses, was used as a measure of health status and expected resource consumption.
Patients with symptoms of depression (CES-D scores > or = 16) were significantly younger (66.6 compared with 68.1 years; P < 0.001), more likely to be white (50.5% compared with 33.9%; P = 0.001), and more likely to be female (75.8% compared with 67.6%; P = 0.001) than were those without these symptoms (CES-D scores < 16). They also had more nonpsychiatric comorbid conditions, had more visits to the ambulatory care center (9.2 compared with 7.8; P < 0.001), were more likely to use the emergency department (52.3% compared with 40%; P = 0.001), were more likely to be hospitalized (22.4% compared with 17%; P = 0.002), and had greater median total diagnostic test charges for a period of 1 year ($583 compared with $387; P < 0.001). The difference in charges, most of which were clinical pathology charges (54.2%), persisted into the second year. Ambulatory Care Group assignment was independently associated with diagnostic test charges. The CES-D summary score was not independently associated with diagnostic test charges when controlling for Ambulatory Care Group assignment.
Patients with symptoms of depression accrue greater average diagnostic test charges. However, these data suggest that such patients also have a greater burden of comorbid nonpsychiatric illness. Efforts to improve outcome and decrease cost for patients who have late-life depression must target interventions to improve the care of psychiatric and medical illness concurrently.
先前的研究记录了抑郁症患者更多地使用医疗服务,并推测通过更好地识别和治疗抑郁症,总体医疗保健成本可能会降低。
确定在有抑郁症症状的老年人中,更重的疾病负担是否会导致诊断检查费用过高。
前瞻性队列研究。
一所学术机构的初级保健团体诊所。
3767名60岁及以上的患者,他们在常规门诊就诊期间完成了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)测试。
两年内所有住院和门诊诊断检查的费用,包括临床病理学、诊断成像和特殊检查;门诊护理中心或急诊科的就诊次数;以及住院次数。基于门诊诊断的门诊护理组病例组合方法被用作健康状况和预期资源消耗的衡量指标。
有抑郁症症状(CES-D评分≥16)的患者比没有这些症状(CES-D评分<16)的患者明显更年轻(66.6岁对68.1岁;P<0.001),更可能是白人(50.5%对33.9%;P = 0.001),更可能是女性(75.8%对67.6%;P = 0.001)。他们也有更多的非精神科合并症,门诊护理中心就诊次数更多(9.2次对7.8次;P<0.001),更可能使用急诊科(52.3%对40%;P = 0.001),更可能住院(22.4%对17%;P = 0.002),并且1年期间的诊断检查总费用中位数更高(583美元对387美元;P<0.001)。费用差异在第二年仍然存在,其中大部分是临床病理学费用(54.2%)。门诊护理组分类与诊断检查费用独立相关。在控制门诊护理组分类后,CES-D总分与诊断检查费用无独立相关性。
有抑郁症症状的患者平均诊断检查费用更高。然而,这些数据表明,这类患者同时也有更重的非精神科合并症负担。改善老年抑郁症患者的治疗效果并降低成本的努力必须针对同时改善精神疾病和躯体疾病护理的干预措施。