Moussa A, Bridges-Webb C
University of Sydney, New South Wales.
Aust Fam Physician. 1994 Mar;23(3):465-8, 472-3.
To identify methods for measuring quality of care in general practice, and to assess general practitioners' views about their acceptability, practicality and usefulness.
A delphi design was used. Questionnaires consisting mainly of open-ended questions were sent to 50 general practice teachers in New South Wales. A second questionnaire derived from the responses from the first round was sent to the same GPs who were asked to rate each of the responses.
The response rate by the general practitioners was 46 per cent for the first questionnaire and 64 per cent for the second one. A total of 29 indicators of quality of care and 20 strategies for assessing quality were suggested. The most favoured indicators were appropriate prescribing, communication skills, and participation in continuing medical education. A mixture of methods assessing both performance and competence was suggested.
A good consensus was achieved by teaching general practitioners criteria for defining and measuring quality of care.
确定全科医疗中衡量医疗质量的方法,并评估全科医生对这些方法的可接受性、实用性和有用性。
采用德尔菲法。主要由开放式问题组成的问卷被发送给新南威尔士州的50名全科医疗教师。第二轮问卷基于第一轮的回复编制而成,并发送给相同的全科医生,要求他们对每个回复进行评分。
第一轮问卷的全科医生回复率为46%,第二轮为64%。共提出了29项医疗质量指标和20项评估质量的策略。最受青睐的指标是合理用药、沟通技巧和参与继续医学教育。建议采用综合评估绩效和能力的方法。
通过向全科医生传授定义和衡量医疗质量的标准,达成了良好的共识。