Phang P T, Cunningham K F, Ronco J J, Wiggs B R, Russell J A
Program of Critical Care Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Aug;150(2):318-23. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049809.
Because of potential for mathematical coupling of measurement errors in shared variables used to calculate oxygen consumption (FickVO2) and oxygen delivery (DO2), we asked whether determination of the FickVO2-DO2 relationship in individual patients with ARDS was statistically valid. We studied 17 clinically resuscitated patients with severe ARDS, measuring FickVO2, CalorimetricVO2 (using analysis of respiratory gases), and DO2 at regular intervals while DO2 was increased using an infusion of dobutamine. Overall, we found that DO2 (pre 482 +/- 143, post 616 +/- 170 ml O2/min.m2, p < 0.01) and FickVO2 (pre 130 +/- 23, post 147 +/- 24 ml O2/min.m2, p < 0.02) increased significantly with dobutamine infusion, but CalorimetricVO2 measured simultaneously did not change (pre 128 +/- 22, post 128 +/- 22 ml O2/min x m2, p = NS). In addition, unpooled weighted slope for FickVO2 versus DO2 (0.06) was significantly different from zero, but unpooled weighted slope for CalorimetricVO2 versus DO2 (0.01) was not significantly different from zero. Slopes of the FickVO2-DO2 relationship were significant for only three individual patients. Using methods by Stratton and colleagues to analyze the effect of mathematical coupling in the FickVO2-DO2 relationship, we found that in all patients the slope of measurement errors was greater than observed slope and that observed slope was greater than estimated true slope. Estimated true slope of the FickVO2-DO2 relationship in all individual patients was not significant. Therefore, we suggest that determination of the FickVO2-DO2 relationship in individual patients who are resuscitated and hemodynamically stable is most often not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
由于用于计算氧耗量(Fick法测定的VO₂)和氧输送(DO₂)的共享变量中测量误差存在潜在的数学耦合关系,我们探讨了在个体急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中确定Fick法测定的VO₂-DO₂关系在统计学上是否有效。我们研究了17例经临床复苏的重度ARDS患者,在使用多巴酚丁胺输注增加DO₂的同时,定期测量Fick法测定的VO₂、量热法测定的VO₂(通过分析呼吸气体)和DO₂。总体而言,我们发现随着多巴酚丁胺输注,DO₂(输注前482±143,输注后616±170 ml O₂/min·m²,p<0.01)和Fick法测定的VO₂(输注前130±23,输注后147±24 ml O₂/min·m²,p<0.02)显著增加,但同时测量的量热法测定的VO₂没有变化(输注前128±22,输注后128±22 ml O₂/min·m²,p=无统计学意义)。此外,Fick法测定的VO₂与DO₂的非合并加权斜率(0.06)显著不同于零,但量热法测定的VO₂与DO₂的非合并加权斜率(0.01)与零无显著差异。Fick法测定的VO₂-DO₂关系的斜率仅在3例个体患者中具有显著性。使用斯特拉顿及其同事的方法分析Fick法测定的VO₂-DO₂关系中数学耦合的影响,我们发现所有患者中测量误差的斜率大于观察到的斜率,且观察到的斜率大于估计的真实斜率。所有个体患者中Fick法测定的VO₂-DO₂关系的估计真实斜率无显著性。因此,我们认为在已复苏且血流动力学稳定的个体患者中确定Fick法测定的VO₂-DO₂关系在大多数情况下无统计学显著性。(摘要截短于250字)