Suppr超能文献

INTERPLAK牙刷与传统牙刷加牙线的临床评估。

Clinical assessment of the INTERPLAK toothbrush vs a conventional brush plus floss.

作者信息

Love J W, Drisko C L, Killoy W J, Tira D E, Love J D

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Dentistry.

出版信息

Compend Suppl. 1993(16):S587-8, S593-8; quiz S612-4.

PMID:8055499
Abstract

Thirty clinical recall patients from the University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Dentistry participated in a 4-week study to determine the long-term effectiveness of the INTERPLAK Home Plaque-Removal Instrument compared to manual brushing and flossing. Patients were divided into two groups, with each group using the INTERPLAK device for 2 months and the manual brush for 2 months. Patients were assessed according to measured indices for plaque, bleeding, crevice depth, and calculus. The study found that both kinds of brushes significantly reduced plaque, bleeding, and crevice depth; however, only the INTERPLAK brush reduced calculus. Improvements on all indices were greater for the INTERPLAK device than they were for manual brushing and flossing. At the end of the 4 months, most patients indicated that they would continue to use the INTERPLAK device.

摘要

来自堪萨斯城密苏里大学牙科学院的30名临床复诊患者参与了一项为期4周的研究,以确定INTERPLAK家用牙菌斑清除器械与手动刷牙和使用牙线相比的长期效果。患者被分为两组,每组使用INTERPLAK器械2个月,使用手动牙刷2个月。根据牙菌斑、出血、龈沟深度和牙结石的测量指标对患者进行评估。研究发现,两种刷牙方式都能显著减少牙菌斑、出血和龈沟深度;然而,只有INTERPLAK牙刷能减少牙结石。INTERPLAK器械在所有指标上的改善都比手动刷牙和使用牙线更大。在4个月结束时,大多数患者表示他们会继续使用INTERPLAK器械。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验