Love J W, Drisko C L, Killoy W J, Tira D E, Love J D
Department of Periodontics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Dentistry.
Compend Suppl. 1993(16):S587-8, S593-8; quiz S612-4.
Thirty clinical recall patients from the University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Dentistry participated in a 4-week study to determine the long-term effectiveness of the INTERPLAK Home Plaque-Removal Instrument compared to manual brushing and flossing. Patients were divided into two groups, with each group using the INTERPLAK device for 2 months and the manual brush for 2 months. Patients were assessed according to measured indices for plaque, bleeding, crevice depth, and calculus. The study found that both kinds of brushes significantly reduced plaque, bleeding, and crevice depth; however, only the INTERPLAK brush reduced calculus. Improvements on all indices were greater for the INTERPLAK device than they were for manual brushing and flossing. At the end of the 4 months, most patients indicated that they would continue to use the INTERPLAK device.
来自堪萨斯城密苏里大学牙科学院的30名临床复诊患者参与了一项为期4周的研究,以确定INTERPLAK家用牙菌斑清除器械与手动刷牙和使用牙线相比的长期效果。患者被分为两组,每组使用INTERPLAK器械2个月,使用手动牙刷2个月。根据牙菌斑、出血、龈沟深度和牙结石的测量指标对患者进行评估。研究发现,两种刷牙方式都能显著减少牙菌斑、出血和龈沟深度;然而,只有INTERPLAK牙刷能减少牙结石。INTERPLAK器械在所有指标上的改善都比手动刷牙和使用牙线更大。在4个月结束时,大多数患者表示他们会继续使用INTERPLAK器械。