• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利医护人员针刺伤的特定器械风险

Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.

作者信息

Ippolito G, De Carli G, Puro V, Petrosillo N, Arici C, Bertucci R, Bianciardi L, Bonazzi L, Cestrone A, Daglio M

机构信息

Lazzaro Spallanzani Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

JAMA. 1994;272(8):607-10.

PMID:8057516
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the types of medical devices causing needlestick injuries among Italian health care workers, to document the device-specific injury rates and time trends for different hollow-bore needles, and to compare injury rates from these devices with those reported in the United States.

DESIGN

Longitudinal survey.

SETTINGS

Twelve Italian acute care public hospitals.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a multihospital surveillance database on the number of total injuries reported in each device category. Hospitals provided the corresponding number of devices used annually for each needle type.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of needlestick injuries by type of hollow-bore needle per 100,000 devices used per year.

RESULTS

A total of 2524 injuries from hollow-bore needles were reported. Disposable syringes/hypodermic needles accounted for 59.3% of injuries, followed by winged steel needles (33.1%), intravenous catheter stylets (5.4%), and vacuum-tube phlebotomy needles (2.2%). Intravenous catheter stylets had the highest needlestick injury rate (15.7/100,000 devices used), and disposable syringes had the lowest needlestick injury rate (3.8/100,000). In contrast to the other devices, the injury rate from winged steel needles increased from 6.2 per 100,000 in 1990 to 13.9 per 100,000 in 1992.

CONCLUSIONS

The device-specific needlestick injury rates in Italy are similar to those reported in the United States, suggesting similar exposure experience in two countries. However, in contrast to the United States, needleless intravenous access is standard practice in Italy and thus eliminates one potential risk to Italian health workers. Implementation of safer equipment, such as shielded or retracting needles, and continuing training programs are needed to further reduce the hazards that health care workers face.

摘要

目的

确定导致意大利医护人员发生针刺伤的医疗设备类型,记录不同空心针的特定设备损伤率和时间趋势,并将这些设备的损伤率与美国报告的损伤率进行比较。

设计

纵向调查。

地点

意大利12家急性护理公立医院。

方法

数据来自多医院监测数据库中每个设备类别报告的总损伤数量。医院提供了每年每种针型使用的相应设备数量。

主要观察指标

每年每100,000使用设备中空心针类型的针刺伤数量。

结果

共报告了2524例空心针损伤。一次性注射器/皮下注射针占损伤的59.3%,其次是翼形钢针(33.1%)、静脉导管芯(5.4%)和真空管采血针(2.2%)。静脉导管芯的针刺伤率最高(每100,000使用设备中有15.7例),一次性注射器的针刺伤率最低(每100,000中有3.8例)。与其他设备不同,翼形钢针的损伤率从1990年的每100,000中有6.2例增加到1992年的每100,000中有13.9例。

结论

意大利特定设备的针刺伤率与美国报告的相似,表明两国的暴露经历相似。然而,与美国不同的是,无针静脉通路在意大利是标准做法,因此消除了对意大利医护人员的一个潜在风险。需要实施更安全的设备,如带防护装置或可回缩的针头,并持续开展培训项目,以进一步降低医护人员面临的风险。

相似文献

1
Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.意大利医护人员针刺伤的特定器械风险
JAMA. 1994;272(8):607-10.
2
Device-specific rates of needlestick injury at a large military teaching hospital.一家大型军队教学医院特定设备的针刺伤发生率。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):750-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
3
Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital.某大学医院中不同器械导致的针刺伤发生率。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Aug 4;319(5):284-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198808043190506.
4
Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.通过安全工程设备减少针刺伤:一项日本多中心研究的结果。
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Feb;92(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.马萨诸塞州急性护理医院员工的锐器伤,2002-2007 年。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;32(6):538-44. doi: 10.1086/660012.
6
Needlestick injuries among health care workers. A literature review.医护人员的针刺伤。文献综述。
AAOHN J. 1999 Jun;47(6):237-44.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.安全工程设备的成本效益分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1012-21. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.110. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.一家大型教学医院的针刺伤:全院更换传统空心针的显著效果
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Apr;36(3):180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.009.
9
Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.一种可安全重新护套的带翼钢针在预防医护人员血管穿刺操作相关经皮损伤中的评估。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1086/502174.
10
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?防护装置能否预防医护人员发生针刺伤?
Am J Infect Control. 1995 Dec;23(6):344-51. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(95)90264-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention from Sharp Injuries in the Hospital Sector: An Italian National Observatory on the Implementation of the Council Directive 2010/32/EU before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.医院部门锐器伤的预防:意大利国家观察站在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间对理事会指令 2010/32/EU 的实施情况进行的监测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711144.
2
Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员在医疗机构中使用安全工程设备进行静脉注射和/或静脉穿刺操作:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16:458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1705-y.
3
Long-term persistence of seroprotection by hepatitis B vaccination in healthcare workers of southern Italy.
意大利南部医护人员乙肝疫苗接种后血清保护的长期持续性
Hepat Mon. 2012 Sep;12(9):e6025. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.6025. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
Needlestick injuries in veterinary medicine.兽医学中的针刺伤
Can Vet J. 2008 Aug;49(8):780-4.
5
Some epidemiological aspects of needle stick injuries among the hospital health care workers: Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯东部省医院医护人员针刺伤的一些流行病学特征
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(5):401-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1013793301772.
6
Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention.丹麦医生的经皮血液暴露:暴露机制与预防策略
Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;13(4):387-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1007369016717.