Suppr超能文献

由于C末端序列的改变,癌蛋白v-Ets在DNA结合方面的选择性不如c-Ets-1。

The oncoprotein v-Ets is less selective in DNA binding than c-Ets-1 due to the C-terminal sequence change.

作者信息

Hahn S L, Wasylyk B

机构信息

LGME-CNRS and U184-INSERM, Institut de Chimie Biologique, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Oncogene. 1994 Sep;9(9):2499-512.

PMID:8058313
Abstract

The oncogene v-ets and the proto-oncogene c-ets-1 code for members of the Ets family of transcription factors that bind to DNA motifs comprising GGA(A/T) through the conserved Ets domain. c-Ets-1 and v-Ets are very similar, differing in sequence only at three positions. In this report we demonstrate that v-Ets has a less stringent target sequence requirement than c-Ets-1. v-Ets binds strongly to a broad spectrum of DNA sequence motifs, and consequently, weaker binding sites have a much greater affinity for v-Ets than c-Ets-1. c-Ets-1 carries two inhibitory domains: the D domain present N-terminal to the DNA binding domain and the C-terminal domain which is mutated in v-Ets. Our results show that the D domain has a stronger inhibitory effect than the C-terminal sequence. The on- and off-rates of c-Ets-1 vary greatly depending on the DNA binding sequences, in contrast to those of v-Ets. The c-Ets-1 on- and off-rates are higher with a strong site than with a weak site. Our data suggest that DNA sequences help c-Ets-1 change from a closed to an open, DNA-binding-competent structure, facilitating its binding to DNA, whereas v-Ets functions without such a process presumably because its different C-terminal sequence generates a constitutively open conformation. The loss of a stringent target sequence selectivity by v-Ets suggests that it might transform cells by altering expression of tightly regulated genes with non-consensus Ets binding sites.

摘要

致癌基因v-ets和原癌基因c-ets-1编码Ets转录因子家族的成员,这些成员通过保守的Ets结构域与包含GGA(A/T)的DNA基序结合。c-Ets-1和v-Ets非常相似,仅在三个位置的序列有所不同。在本报告中,我们证明v-Ets比c-Ets-1对靶序列的要求不那么严格。v-Ets能强烈结合广泛的DNA序列基序,因此,与c-Ets-1相比,较弱的结合位点对v-Ets具有更高的亲和力。c-Ets-1带有两个抑制结构域:位于DNA结合结构域N端的D结构域和在v-Ets中发生突变的C端结构域。我们的结果表明,D结构域的抑制作用比C端序列更强。与v-Ets相比,c-Ets-1的结合和解离速率根据DNA结合序列的不同有很大差异。c-Ets-1在强结合位点的结合和解离速率高于弱结合位点。我们的数据表明,DNA序列有助于c-Ets-1从封闭结构转变为开放的、具有DNA结合能力的结构,从而促进其与DNA的结合,而v-Ets可能无需这样的过程就能发挥作用,大概是因为其不同的C端序列产生了组成型开放构象。v-Ets失去严格的靶序列选择性表明,它可能通过改变具有非共识Ets结合位点的严格调控基因的表达来转化细胞。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验