Wasylyk C, Wasylyk B
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire des Eucaryotes/Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France.
Cell Growth Differ. 1992 Sep;3(9):617-25.
The vEts oncoprotein and its progenitor cEts1(p68) belong to a growing family of transcription factors that are related by the conserved ets domain. We show here that the ets domain and adjacent COOH-terminal amino acids are required for DNA binding by cEts1(p68). vEts differs from cEts1(p68) in both the COOH-terminal sequence and an amino acid substitution in the ets domain. The change in the COOH-terminal sequence markedly decreases its affinity for specific DNA, and the ets domain mutation further diminishes binding. vEts does not trans-activate through the ets (PEA3) motif in vivo. Surprisingly, vEts still efficiently trans-activates the promoters of two genes, stromelysin and collagenase, that are found to be overexpressed in transformed cells. The AP1 motifs of both promoters are required for efficient activation. vEts does not bind to the AP1 motif, even in the presence of cJun and cFos. The DNA-binding domain of Ets1 is required for activation through the AP1 element. Activation is inhibited by the expression of the glucocorticoid and retinoic acid receptors, suggesting that activation by Ets does not involve reversal of negative regulators of AP1. We suggest that activation is by an indirect mechanism involving activation of endogenous genes. Our results show that vEts differs from its progenitor cEts1(p68) in its trans-activating properties. The findings suggest that activation of the Jun and Fos oncoprotein pathway is important for transformation by Ets.
vEts癌蛋白及其前体cEts1(p68)属于一个不断扩大的转录因子家族,这些转录因子通过保守的ets结构域相关联。我们在此表明,cEts1(p68)与DNA结合需要ets结构域和相邻的COOH末端氨基酸。vEts在COOH末端序列和ets结构域中的一个氨基酸取代方面与cEts1(p68)不同。COOH末端序列的变化显著降低了其对特定DNA的亲和力,而ets结构域突变进一步削弱了结合。vEts在体内不通过ets(PEA3)基序进行反式激活。令人惊讶的是,vEts仍然有效地反式激活了在转化细胞中发现过表达的两个基因(基质溶解素和胶原酶)的启动子。两个启动子的AP1基序对于有效激活是必需的。即使存在cJun和cFos,vEts也不与AP1基序结合。Ets1的DNA结合结构域对于通过AP1元件的激活是必需的。糖皮质激素和视黄酸受体的表达抑制了激活,这表明Ets的激活不涉及AP1负调节因子的逆转。我们认为激活是通过涉及内源性基因激活的间接机制。我们的结果表明,vEts在其反式激活特性上与其前体cEts1(p68)不同。这些发现表明,Jun和Fos癌蛋白途径的激活对于Ets介导的转化很重要。