Crane J P, LeFevre M L, Winborn R C, Evans J K, Ewigman B G, Bain R P, Frigoletto F D, McNellis D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):392-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70040-0.
The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to test the hypothesis that ultrasonographic screening would significantly alter perinatal outcome as a result of the antenatal detection of fetal congenital malformations.
Pregnant women without a specific indication for ultrasonography were randomly assigned to have either two screening sonograms (15 to 22 weeks and 31 to 35 weeks) or conventional obstetric care with ultrasonography used only as determined by the clinical judgment of the patient's physician. The frequency of birth defect detection in the screened and control populations was compared, as was the impact of discovery on pregnancy outcome.
Major congenital malformations occurred in 2.3% of the 15,281 fetuses and infants in this study. Antenatal ultrasonography detected 35% of the anomalous fetuses in the screened group versus only 11% in the control population (relative detection rate 3.1; 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.1). Ultrasonography screening did not, however, significantly influence the management or outcome of pregnancies complicated by congenital malformations. Specifically, only 9 abortions were performed for anomalies among 7685 fetuses in the screened group whereas 4 pregnancies were terminated for fetal anomalies detected among 7596 control subjects. Ultrasonography screening also had no significant impact on survival rates among infants with potentially treatable, life-threatening anomalies despite the opportunity to take precautionary measures such as delivery in a tertiary center.
Ultrasonography screening in a low-risk pregnant population had no significant impact on the frequency of abortion for fetal anomalies. Survival rates for anomalous fetuses were also unaffected by screening.
本随机临床试验的目的是检验以下假设,即超声筛查由于产前检测出胎儿先天性畸形而会显著改变围产期结局。
无超声检查特定指征的孕妇被随机分为两组,一组接受两次筛查超声检查(孕15至22周和31至35周),另一组接受常规产科护理,仅根据患者医生的临床判断使用超声检查。比较筛查组和对照组中出生缺陷的检出频率,以及发现异常对妊娠结局的影响。
本研究中15281例胎儿和婴儿中有2.3%发生了严重先天性畸形。产前超声检查在筛查组中检测出35%的异常胎儿,而在对照组中仅检测出11%(相对检出率3.1;95%置信区间2.0至5.1)。然而,超声筛查并未显著影响合并先天性畸形妊娠的处理或结局。具体而言,筛查组7685例胎儿中仅9例因畸形而流产,而对照组7596例中4例因检测出胎儿畸形而终止妊娠。尽管有机会采取预防措施,如在三级中心分娩,但超声筛查对患有潜在可治疗的危及生命畸形的婴儿的存活率也没有显著影响。
对低风险孕妇群体进行超声筛查对因胎儿畸形导致的流产频率没有显著影响。筛查也未影响异常胎儿的存活率。