Schneider D, Bukovsky I, Caspi E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):554-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90299-2.
The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess whether there was an increased perioperative risk in midtrimester pregnancy termination by laminaria and evacuation associated with a previous uterine scar.
From 1978 to 1993 1064 patients underwent midtrimester (14 to 22 weeks) pregnancy termination by means of laminaria and evacuation. Of these, 70 patients had a previous uterine scar and are the subjects of this study.
There were no major operative complications, such as anesthetic complications, perforations, or cervical lacerations, in the entire series. Mean operative time (minutes) for induced abortion was statistically similar in the unscarred compared with the scarred uteri groups (8.03 +/- 4.40 vs 7.46 +/- 4.42, respectively) and was statistically different when the indication for evacuation was missed abortion (6.08 +/- 1.86 vs 4.81 +/- 2.11, respectively; p < 0.005). This difference in operative time could be explained by the number of laminaria tents used in each group. Atony with hemorrhage occurred in two patients who underwent induced abortion, and disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in eight missed abortion cases, but none had scarred uterus.
Previous cesarean section scar does not seem to increase the perioperative risk of late termination (14 to 22 weeks) by the laminaria and evacuation technique.
本研究的目的是回顾性评估对于曾有子宫瘢痕的患者,通过海藻棒扩张和清宫术终止妊娠中期妊娠时围手术期风险是否增加。
1978年至1993年期间,1064例患者通过海藻棒扩张和清宫术终止妊娠中期(14至22周)妊娠。其中,70例患者曾有子宫瘢痕,为本研究对象。
在整个系列中,没有出现重大手术并发症,如麻醉并发症、穿孔或宫颈裂伤。与子宫无瘢痕组相比,子宫有瘢痕组人工流产的平均手术时间(分钟)在统计学上相似(分别为8.03±4.40和7.46±4.42),而当清宫指征为稽留流产时,两组手术时间在统计学上有差异(分别为6.08±1.86和4.81±2.11;p<0.005)。手术时间的这种差异可以用每组使用的海藻棒数量来解释。两名接受人工流产的患者发生宫缩乏力伴出血,八例稽留流产患者发生弥散性血管内凝血,但均无子宫瘢痕。
既往剖宫产瘢痕似乎不会增加通过海藻棒扩张和清宫术进行妊娠晚期(14至22周)终止妊娠的围手术期风险。