• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The arrival of the ED-based POISINDEX: perceived impact on poison control center use.

作者信息

Wax P M, Rodewald L, Lawrence R

机构信息

Finger Lakes Poison Control Center, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 1994 Sep;12(5):537-40. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90273-9.

DOI:10.1016/0735-6757(94)90273-9
PMID:8060408
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of emergency department-based POISINDEX (Micromedex Inc, Denver, CO) and assess its perceived impact on use of poison control centers. Survey methodology was used. A written questionnaire was distributed to all emergency departments (EDs) in the state of New York. ED directors or their designee (n = 239) were surveyed regarding the presence of POISINDEX in their ED and their perceptions of its impact on ED use of poison control centers. Completed questionnaires were returned from 180 of 239 (75%) EDs. Of the returned questionnaires, 42 of 180 (23%) have their own POISINDEX. In 32 of 42 (76%) of these EDs that have their own POISINDEX, it was perceived that ED-based POISINDEX decreased poison control center use. Use of ED-based POISINDEX may decrease ED use of poison control centers.

摘要

相似文献

1
The arrival of the ED-based POISINDEX: perceived impact on poison control center use.
Am J Emerg Med. 1994 Sep;12(5):537-40. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90273-9.
2
Use of clinical toxicology resources by emergency physicians and its impact on poison control centers.
Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Feb;20(2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81213-2.
3
Poison-related visits in a pediatric emergency department: A retrospective analysis of patients who bypass poison control centers.儿科急诊中毒相关就诊:绕过中毒控制中心的患者回顾性分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1554-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158418. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Clinical utility of an electronic poisons information and clinical decision support tool.
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Aug;71(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00009-1.
5
Toxicological exposures among the pediatric patients at a tertiary care center in Lebanon: the case for establishing a national poison center.黎巴嫩一家三级护理中心儿科患者的中毒暴露情况:建立国家中毒中心的必要性。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Sep;59(9):780-785. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1874404. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
The value of a poison control center in preventing unnecessary ED visits and hospital charges: A multi-year analysis.毒物控制中心在预防不必要的急诊就诊和医院费用方面的价值:一项多年分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):438-443. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.049. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use or improve outcome.在家使用吐根糖浆并不能减少急诊就诊次数或改善治疗结果。
Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1061-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1061.
8
Poisonings and clinical toxicology: a template for Ireland.中毒与临床毒理学:爱尔兰模式。
Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Mar;182(1):17-23. doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0828-3. Epub 2012 May 13.
9
Does prearrival communication from a poison center to an emergency department decrease time to activated charcoal for pediatric poisoning?毒物控制中心与急诊科之间的到达前沟通能否减少小儿中毒患者给予活性炭的时间?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1045-51. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235ea02.
10
Emergency department poison advice telephone calls.急诊科中毒咨询电话
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;25(3):349-52. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70293-8.