Jepson N J, McCabe J F, Storer R
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Newscastle upon Tyne.
Br Dent J. 1994 Jul 9;177(1):11-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808489.
Forty-four patients, most of whom had previous experience of soft linings, had a total of 62 soft linings placed in their lower complete dentures:32 of the silicone-based Molloplast-band 30 of the heat-cured plasticised acrylic Palasiv 62. Linings were evaluated at insertion and then at 3-monthly intervals. Surface changes and the reasons for lining replacement were used to assess the clinical serviceability of the linings. The median survival time of Molloplast-b linings was significantly greater than that of Palasiv 62, whose performance was inadequate with frequent failure due to surface deterioration, with and without a failure of bonding. Denture fracture was the most common cause of lining failure for Molloplast-b and occurred more frequently than with Palasiv 62. Fading and lining discolouration was commonly observed for both materials.
44名患者(其中大多数曾有过使用软衬的经历)在其下颌全口义齿中总共放置了62个软衬:32个硅酮基的Molloplast-b和30个热固化增塑丙烯酸树脂的Palasiv 62。在软衬插入时进行评估,随后每隔3个月评估一次。通过表面变化和软衬更换原因来评估软衬的临床适用性。Molloplast-b软衬的中位存活时间显著长于Palasiv 62,后者由于表面劣化,无论是否伴有粘结失败,频繁出现性能不足的情况。义齿折断是Molloplast-b软衬失败的最常见原因,且比Palasiv 62更频繁发生。两种材料均普遍观察到褪色和衬里变色现象。