Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D, Avrunin J S, Gehlbach S H, Rapoport J, Rué M
School of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1351-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199409000-00003.
To develop models in the Mortality Probability Model (MPM II) system to estimate the probability of hospital mortality at 48 and 72 hrs in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to test whether the 24-hr Mortality Probability Model (MPM24), developed for use at 24 hrs in the ICU, can be used on a daily basis beyond 24 hrs.
A prospective, multicenter study to develop and validate models, using a cohort of consecutive admissions.
Six adult medical and surgical ICUs in Massachusetts and New York adjusted to reflect 137 ICUs in 12 countries.
Consecutive admissions (n = 6,290) to the Massachusetts/New York ICUs were studied. Of these patients, 3,023 and 2,233 patients remained in the ICU and had complete data at 48 and 72 hrs, respectively. Patients < 18 yrs of age, burn patients, coronary care patients, and cardiac surgical patients were excluded.
Vital status at the time of hospital discharge.
The models consist of five variables measured at the time of ICU admission and eight variables ascertained at 24-hr intervals. The 24-hr model demonstrated poor calibration and discrimination at 48 and 72 hrs. The newly developed 48- and 72-hr models--MPM48 and MPM72--contain the same 13 variables and coefficients as the MPM24. The models differ only in their constant terms, which increase in a manner that reflects the increasing probability of mortality with increasing length of stay in the ICU. These constant terms were adjusted by a factor determined from the relationship between the data from the six Massachusetts and New York ICUs and a more extensive data set, from which the ICU admission Mortality Probability Model (MPM0) and MPM24 were developed. This latter data set was assembled from ICUs in 12 countries. The MPM48 and MPM72 calibrated and discriminated well, based on goodness-of-fit tests and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Models developed for use among ICU patients at one time period are not transferable without modification to other time periods. The MPM48 and MPM72 calibrated well to their respective time periods, and they are intended for use at specific points in time. The increasing constant terms and associated increase in the probability of hospital mortality exemplify a common clinical adage that if a patient's clinical profile stays the same, he or she is actually getting worse.
在死亡率概率模型(MPM II)系统中开发模型,以估计重症监护病房(ICU)48小时和72小时的医院死亡概率,并测试为在ICU 24小时使用而开发的24小时死亡率概率模型(MPM24)是否可在24小时之后每日使用。
一项前瞻性、多中心研究,使用连续入院患者队列来开发和验证模型。
马萨诸塞州和纽约州的6个成人内科和外科ICU,经调整后反映12个国家的137个ICU。
对马萨诸塞州/纽约州ICU的连续入院患者(n = 6290)进行研究。其中,分别有3023例和2233例患者在ICU停留,并在48小时和72小时时有完整数据。排除年龄<18岁的患者、烧伤患者、冠心病监护患者和心脏手术患者。
出院时的生命状态。
这些模型由ICU入院时测量的5个变量和每隔24小时确定的8个变量组成。24小时模型在48小时和72小时时校准和区分效果不佳。新开发的48小时和72小时模型——MPM48和MPM72——包含与MPM24相同的13个变量和系数。这些模型仅在常数项上有所不同,常数项的增加方式反映了随着在ICU停留时间的增加死亡概率的增加。这些常数项通过一个因子进行调整,该因子由来自马萨诸塞州和纽约州的6个ICU的数据与一个更广泛的数据集之间的关系确定,后者是开发ICU入院死亡率概率模型(MPM0)和MPM24的基础。后一个数据集是从12个国家的ICU收集的。基于拟合优度检验和受试者操作特征曲线下面积,MPM48和MPM72校准和区分效果良好。
为ICU患者在一个时间段开发的模型未经修改不能直接用于其他时间段。MPM48和MPM72在各自时间段校准良好,旨在用于特定时间点。常数项的增加以及随之而来的医院死亡概率的增加例证了一条常见的临床格言:如果患者的临床状况保持不变,实际上他或她的病情正在恶化。