• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者48或72小时死亡率概率模型:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: a prospective, multicenter study.

作者信息

Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D, Avrunin J S, Gehlbach S H, Rapoport J, Rué M

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1351-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199409000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199409000-00003
PMID:8062556
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop models in the Mortality Probability Model (MPM II) system to estimate the probability of hospital mortality at 48 and 72 hrs in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to test whether the 24-hr Mortality Probability Model (MPM24), developed for use at 24 hrs in the ICU, can be used on a daily basis beyond 24 hrs.

DESIGN

A prospective, multicenter study to develop and validate models, using a cohort of consecutive admissions.

SETTING

Six adult medical and surgical ICUs in Massachusetts and New York adjusted to reflect 137 ICUs in 12 countries.

PATIENTS

Consecutive admissions (n = 6,290) to the Massachusetts/New York ICUs were studied. Of these patients, 3,023 and 2,233 patients remained in the ICU and had complete data at 48 and 72 hrs, respectively. Patients < 18 yrs of age, burn patients, coronary care patients, and cardiac surgical patients were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Vital status at the time of hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The models consist of five variables measured at the time of ICU admission and eight variables ascertained at 24-hr intervals. The 24-hr model demonstrated poor calibration and discrimination at 48 and 72 hrs. The newly developed 48- and 72-hr models--MPM48 and MPM72--contain the same 13 variables and coefficients as the MPM24. The models differ only in their constant terms, which increase in a manner that reflects the increasing probability of mortality with increasing length of stay in the ICU. These constant terms were adjusted by a factor determined from the relationship between the data from the six Massachusetts and New York ICUs and a more extensive data set, from which the ICU admission Mortality Probability Model (MPM0) and MPM24 were developed. This latter data set was assembled from ICUs in 12 countries. The MPM48 and MPM72 calibrated and discriminated well, based on goodness-of-fit tests and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Models developed for use among ICU patients at one time period are not transferable without modification to other time periods. The MPM48 and MPM72 calibrated well to their respective time periods, and they are intended for use at specific points in time. The increasing constant terms and associated increase in the probability of hospital mortality exemplify a common clinical adage that if a patient's clinical profile stays the same, he or she is actually getting worse.

摘要

目的

在死亡率概率模型(MPM II)系统中开发模型,以估计重症监护病房(ICU)48小时和72小时的医院死亡概率,并测试为在ICU 24小时使用而开发的24小时死亡率概率模型(MPM24)是否可在24小时之后每日使用。

设计

一项前瞻性、多中心研究,使用连续入院患者队列来开发和验证模型。

设置

马萨诸塞州和纽约州的6个成人内科和外科ICU,经调整后反映12个国家的137个ICU。

患者

对马萨诸塞州/纽约州ICU的连续入院患者(n = 6290)进行研究。其中,分别有3023例和2233例患者在ICU停留,并在48小时和72小时时有完整数据。排除年龄<18岁的患者、烧伤患者、冠心病监护患者和心脏手术患者。

观察指标

出院时的生命状态。

结果

这些模型由ICU入院时测量的5个变量和每隔24小时确定的8个变量组成。24小时模型在48小时和72小时时校准和区分效果不佳。新开发的48小时和72小时模型——MPM48和MPM72——包含与MPM24相同的13个变量和系数。这些模型仅在常数项上有所不同,常数项的增加方式反映了随着在ICU停留时间的增加死亡概率的增加。这些常数项通过一个因子进行调整,该因子由来自马萨诸塞州和纽约州的6个ICU的数据与一个更广泛的数据集之间的关系确定,后者是开发ICU入院死亡率概率模型(MPM0)和MPM24的基础。后一个数据集是从12个国家的ICU收集的。基于拟合优度检验和受试者操作特征曲线下面积,MPM48和MPM72校准和区分效果良好。

结论

为ICU患者在一个时间段开发的模型未经修改不能直接用于其他时间段。MPM48和MPM72在各自时间段校准良好,旨在用于特定时间点。常数项的增加以及随之而来的医院死亡概率的增加例证了一条常见的临床格言:如果患者的临床状况保持不变,实际上他或她的病情正在恶化。

相似文献

1
Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: a prospective, multicenter study.重症监护病房患者48或72小时死亡率概率模型:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1351-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199409000-00003.
2
Performance of the Mortality Probability Models in assessing severity of illness during the first week in the intensive care unit.死亡率概率模型在评估重症监护病房第一周内疾病严重程度方面的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):2819-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00023.
3
Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.基于国际重症监护病房患者队列的死亡概率模型(MPM II)。
JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2478-86.
4
Predicting Mortality in Low-Income Country ICUs: The Rwanda Mortality Probability Model (R-MPM).预测低收入国家重症监护病房的死亡率:卢旺达死亡率概率模型(R-MPM)。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155858. eCollection 2016.
5
Factors affecting the performance of the models in the Mortality Probability Model II system and strategies of customization: a simulation study.影响死亡率概率模型II系统中模型性能的因素及定制策略:一项模拟研究。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00011.
6
Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.在一个大型苏格兰数据库中对五种重症监护评分模型的性能评估。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00023.
7
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
8
Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III).评估当代重症监护病房的预后:更新的死亡概率入院模型(MPM0-III)。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):827-35. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257337.63529.9F.
9
Prospective validation of the intensive care unit admission Mortality Probability Model (MPM0-III).重症监护病房入院死亡率概率模型(MPM0-III)的前瞻性验证。
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1619-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819ded31.
10
A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度评分系统的比较:一项多中心、跨国研究的结果。欧洲/北美严重程度研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;23(8):1327-35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199508000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of outcomes between anemic and non-anemic critically ill elderly patients in a geriatric ICU in Egypt: A focused study.埃及一家老年重症监护病房中贫血与非贫血老年重症患者结局的比较分析:一项重点研究。
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025 Jul 31;11(3):290-300. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0028. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Contrastive Learning for Clinical Outcome Prediction with Partial Data Sources.利用部分数据源进行临床结果预测的对比学习
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2024 Jul;235:54156-54177.
3
Forecasting disease trajectories in critical illness: comparison of probabilistic dynamic systems to static models to predict patient status in the intensive care unit.
预测危重病患者的疾病轨迹:概率动态系统与静态模型预测重症监护病房患者状态的比较。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e079243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079243.
4
The Addition of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to the Prognostic Scoring Systems Did Not Improve Mortality Prediction in Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.将老年营养风险指数添加到预后评分系统中并不能改善重症监护病房创伤患者的死亡率预测。
Emerg Med Int. 2023 May 31;2023:3768646. doi: 10.1155/2023/3768646. eCollection 2023.
5
Using Second Measurement of De Ritis Ratio to Improve Mortality Prediction in Adult Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Unit.使用第二次德瑞蒂斯比值测量来改善重症监护病房成年创伤患者的死亡率预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;12(12):2930. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122930.
6
An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Guiding the Management of Heart Failure Patients Using Predictive Models: A Systematic Review.一种使用预测模型指导心力衰竭患者管理的人工智能方法:系统评价
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 5;10(9):2188. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092188.
7
Assessment of the Clinical Interpreter of Death in Life-Threatening Infective Cases Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit of a North-Eastern State of India.印度东北部某邦重症监护病房收治的危及生命感染病例中死亡临床判定的评估
Cureus. 2021 Mar 16;13(3):e13915. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13915.
8
Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit of a Trauma Center.创伤中心重症监护病房创伤患者预后评分系统的性能。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 2;17(19):7226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197226.
9
Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for near-term in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19.基于机器学习的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者短期院内死亡预测模型的开发与验证
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002602.
10
Actor feedback and rigorous monitoring: Essential quality assurance tools for testing behavioral interventions with simulation.演员反馈和严格监测:测试基于模拟的行为干预措施的必要质量保证工具。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233538. eCollection 2020.