Warshawsky M J
Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC 20224.
Health Serv Res. 1994 Aug;29(3):293-313.
STUDY QUESTION. Can the steady increases in health care expenditures as a share of GDP projected by widely cited actuarial models be rationalized by a macroeconomic model with sensible parameters and specification? DATA SOURCES. National Income and Product Accounts, and Social Security and Health Care Financing Administration are the data sources used in parameters estimates. STUDY DESIGN. Health care expenditures as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) are projected using two methodological approaches--actuarial and macroeconomic--and under various assumptions. The general equilibrium macroeconomic approach has the advantage of allowing an investigation of the causes of growth in the health care sector and its consequences for the overall economy. DATA COLLECTION METHODS. Simulations are used. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. Both models unanimously project a continued increase in the ratio of health care expenditures to GDP. Under the most conservative assumptions, that is, robust economic growth, improved demographic trends, or a significant moderation in the rate of health care price inflation, the health care sector will consume more than a quarter of national output by 2065. Under other (perhaps more realistic) assumptions, including a continuation of current trends, both approaches predict that health care expenditures will comprise between a third and a half of national output. In the macroeconomic model, the increasing use of capital goods in the health care sector explains the observed rise in relative prices. Moreover, this "capital deepening" implies that a relatively modest fraction of the labor force is employed in health care and that the rest of the economy is increasingly starved for capital, resulting in a declining standard of living.
研究问题。广泛引用的精算模型所预测的医疗保健支出占国内生产总值(GDP)的份额持续增长,能否通过一个具有合理参数和设定的宏观经济模型来解释其合理性?
数据来源。国民收入与生产账户以及社会保障与医疗保健融资管理局是参数估计中使用的数据来源。
研究设计。使用两种方法——精算方法和宏观经济方法,并在各种假设下预测医疗保健支出占国内生产总值(GDP)的份额。一般均衡宏观经济方法的优势在于能够研究医疗保健部门增长的原因及其对整体经济的影响。
数据收集方法。使用模拟方法。
主要研究结果。两个模型均一致预测医疗保健支出与GDP的比率将持续上升。在最保守的假设下,即强劲的经济增长、改善的人口趋势或医疗保健价格通胀率显著放缓,到2065年医疗保健部门将消耗超过四分之一的国民产出。在其他(或许更现实)的假设下,包括延续当前趋势,两种方法都预测医疗保健支出将占国民产出的三分之一到二分之一。在宏观经济模型中,医疗保健部门资本品使用的增加解释了观察到的相对价格上涨。此外,这种“资本深化”意味着相对较少比例的劳动力受雇于医疗保健行业,而经济的其他部分越来越缺乏资本,导致生活水平下降。