Burdick Clark, Fisher Lynn
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, Social Security Administration, USA.
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(3):73-88.
OASDI benefits are indexed for inflation to protect beneficiaries from the loss of purchasing power implied by inflation. In the absence of such indexing, the purchasing power of Social Security benefits would be eroded as rising prices raise the cost of living. By statute, cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for Social Security benefits are calculated using the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). Some argue that this index does not accurately reflect the inflation experienced by the elderly population and should be changed to an elderly-specific price index such as the Experimental Consumer Price Index for Americans 62 Years of Age and Older, often referred to as the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E). Others argue that the measure of inflation underlying the COLA is technically biased, causing it to overestimate changes in the cost of living. This argument implies that current COLAs tend to increase, rather than merely maintain, the purchasing power of benefits over time. Potential bias in the CPI as a cost-of-living index arises from a number of sources, including incomplete accounting for the ability of consumers to substitute goods or change purchasing outlets in response to relative price changes. The BLS has constructed a new index called the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U) that better accounts for those consumer adjustments. Price indexes are not true cost-of-living indexes, but approximations of cost-of-living indexes (COLI). The Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006a) explains the difference between the two: As it pertains to the CPI, the COLI for the current month is based on the answer to the following question: "What is the cost, at this month ' market prices, of achieving the standard of living actually attained in the base period?" This cost is a hypothetical expenditure-the lowest expenditure level necessary at this month's prices to achieve the base-period's living standard.... Unfortunately, because the cost of achieving a living standard cannot be observed directly, in operational terms, a COLI can only be approximated. Although the CPI cannot be said to equal a cost-of-living index, the concept of the COLI provides the CPI's measurement objective and the standard by which we define any bias in the CPI. While all versions of the CPI only approximate the actual changes in the cost of living, the CPI-E has several additional technical limitations. First, the CPI-E may better account for the goods and services typically purchased by the elderly, but the expenditure weights for the elderly are the only difference between the CPI-E and CPI-W. These weights are based on a much smaller sample than the other two indices, making it less precise. Second, the CPI-E does not account for differences in retail outlets frequented by the aged population or the prices they pay. Finally, the purchasing population measured in the CPI-E is not necessarily identical to the Social Security beneficiary population, where more than one-fifth of OASDI beneficiaries are under age 62. Likewise, over one-fifth of persons aged 62 or older are not beneficiaries, but they are included in the CPI-E population. Finally, changes in the index used to calculate COLAs directly affect the amount of benefits paid, and as a result, projected solvency of the Social Security program. A switch to the CPI-E for the December 2006 COLA (received in January 2007) would have resulted in an average monthly benefit $0.90 higher than that received. If the December 2006 COLA had been adjusted by the Chained CPI-U instead, the average monthly benefit would have been $4.70 less than with current indexing. Any changes to the COLA that would cause faster growth in individual benefits would make the projected date of insolvency sooner, while slower growth would delay insolvency. Hobijn and Lagakos (2003) estimated that switching to the CPI-E for COLAs would move projected insolvency sooner by 3-5 years. A projection by SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary estimated that annual COLAs based on the Chained C-CPI-U beginning in 2006 would delay the date of OASDI insolvency by 4 years.
老年、遗属和伤残保险(OASDI)福利会根据通货膨胀进行指数化调整,以保护受益人免受通货膨胀所带来的购买力损失。如果没有这种指数化调整,随着物价上涨推高生活成本,社会保障福利的购买力将会被侵蚀。根据法律规定,社会保障福利的生活成本调整(COLAs)是使用劳工统计局(BLS)的城市工资 earners 和文职人员消费者价格指数(CPI-W)来计算的。一些人认为,该指数不能准确反映老年人口所经历的通货膨胀情况,应该改为一个针对老年人的特定价格指数,比如62岁及以上美国人的实验性消费者价格指数,通常被称为老年人消费者价格指数(CPI-E)。另一些人则认为,生活成本调整所依据的通货膨胀衡量指标在技术上存在偏差,导致其高估了生活成本的变化。这种观点意味着,随着时间的推移,当前的生活成本调整往往会增加而非仅仅维持福利的购买力。作为生活成本指数的消费者价格指数(CPI)存在潜在偏差的原因有很多,包括没有充分考虑消费者根据相对价格变化替代商品或改变购买渠道的能力。劳工统计局构建了一个新的指数,称为所有城市消费者链式消费者价格指数(C-CPI-U),它能更好地考虑到这些消费者调整。价格指数并非真正的生活成本指数,而是生活成本指数(COLI)的近似值。劳工统计局(2006a)解释了两者之间的区别:就消费者价格指数而言,当月的生活成本指数基于以下问题的答案:“按照本月的市场价格,达到基期实际实现的生活水平需要多少成本?” 这个成本是一种假设性支出 —— 按照本月价格达到基期生活水平所需的最低支出水平…… 不幸的是,由于无法直接观察到实现生活水平的成本,实际上,生活成本指数只能近似估算。虽然不能说消费者价格指数等同于生活成本指数,但生活成本指数的概念为消费者价格指数的衡量目标以及我们定义消费者价格指数中任何偏差的标准提供了依据。虽然消费者价格指数的所有版本都只是近似估算生活成本的实际变化,但老年人消费者价格指数还有几个额外的技术限制。首先,老年人消费者价格指数可能能更好地考虑老年人通常购买的商品和服务,但老年人的支出权重是老年人消费者价格指数与城市工资 earners 和文职人员消费者价格指数之间唯一的区别。这些权重所基于的样本比其他两个指数小得多,这使得它不够精确。其次,老年人消费者价格指数没有考虑老年人口光顾的零售网点差异或他们支付的价格。最后,老年人消费者价格指数所衡量的购买人群不一定与社会保障受益人人群相同,在老年、遗属和伤残保险受益人中,超过五分之一的人年龄在62岁以下。同样,超过五分之一年龄在62岁及以上的人不是受益人,但他们被纳入了老年人消费者价格指数人群。最后,用于计算生活成本调整的指数变化直接影响支付的福利金额,因此也影响社会保障计划的预计偿付能力。如果在2006年12月的生活成本调整(2007年1月领取)中改用老年人消费者价格指数,平均每月福利将比实际领取的高出0.90美元。如果2006年12月的生活成本调整改用链式消费者价格指数进行调整,平均每月福利将比当前指数化调整少4.70美元。生活成本调整的任何变化,若导致个人福利增长更快,将使预计的偿付能力日期提前,而增长较慢则会推迟偿付能力日期。霍比恩和拉加科斯(2003)估计,改用老年人消费者价格指数进行生活成本调整将使预计的偿付能力日期提前3至5年。社会保障局首席精算师办公室的一项预测估计,从2006年开始基于链式C-CPI-U进行年度生活成本调整将使老年、遗属和伤残保险偿付能力日期推迟4年。