Suppr超能文献

新生儿持续性肺动脉高压无通气过度治疗:创新扩散评估

Treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn without hyperventilation: an assessment of diffusion of innovation.

作者信息

Walsh-Sukys M C, Cornell D J, Houston L N, Keszler M, Kanto W P

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):303-6.

PMID:8065854
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is controversial with no consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatments. Hyperventilation has been the therapeutic mainstay. However, two widely variant alternative approaches have been proposed: ventilation without induced alkalosis, or more aggressive therapies such as high frequency ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We wished to determine the extent to which these alternative treatments have diffused into practice.

METHODS

A forced choice questionnaire was mailed to a sample representing 10% of 3740 practicing neonatologists. Sixty percent of those surveyed responded. Data on treatment practices was tabulated. Subanalyses with respect to training era, practice site, and geographic region were performed.

RESULTS

In patients with meconium aspiration syndrome, without evidence of PPHN, 36% described their initial management as hyperventilation. If PPHN was confirmed, hyperventilation was used in 90% of patients by 44% of the respondents. Muscular paralysis and inotropic support were also used frequently. Alkali and vasodilator infusion were used less frequently. The gentle ventilation strategy proposed by Wung and James at Columbia Babies Hospital was used infrequently by 47% of respondents. Gentle ventilation was used more frequently by board-certified neonatologists than those not certified. No significant differences in practice were identified by geographic region or era of training. When standard treatment failed, only 40% of the respondents utilized rescue treatments such as high frequency ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents that gentle ventilation, an easily and inexpensively adopted innovation, has not diffused into practice significantly while more expensive high technology treatments, such as high frequency ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, have penetrated more significantly.

摘要

目的

新生儿持续性肺动脉高压(PPHN)的治疗存在争议,在诊断标准或治疗方法上尚未达成共识。过度通气一直是主要的治疗手段。然而,已经提出了两种差异很大的替代方法:不诱发碱中毒的通气,或更积极的治疗方法,如高频通气或体外膜肺氧合。我们希望确定这些替代治疗方法在实际应用中的普及程度。

方法

向代表3740名执业新生儿科医生中10%的样本邮寄了一份强制选择问卷。60%的受访者回复。将治疗实践数据制成表格。对培训时代、实践地点和地理区域进行了亚分析。

结果

在胎粪吸入综合征患者中,若无PPHN证据,36%的医生称其初始治疗为过度通气。若确诊为PPHN,44%的受访者中有90%的患者使用过度通气。肌肉麻痹和强心支持也经常使用。碱液和血管扩张剂输注使用较少。哥伦比亚儿童医院的Wung和James提出的温和通气策略,47%的受访者很少使用。获得委员会认证的新生儿科医生比未获认证的医生更频繁地使用温和通气。在地理区域或培训时代方面,实践中未发现显著差异。当标准治疗失败时,只有40%的受访者采用高频通气或体外膜肺氧合等抢救治疗方法。

结论

本研究表明,温和通气作为一种易于采用且成本低廉的创新方法,尚未在实际应用中得到显著推广,而更昂贵的高科技治疗方法,如高频通气和体外膜肺氧合,应用更为广泛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验