• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划CT到模拟定位机的转移误差:设置不准确的一个可能来源?

Transfer errors of planning CT to simulator: a possible source of setup inaccuracies?

作者信息

Bel A, Bartelink H, Vijlbrief R E, Lebesque J V

机构信息

Radiotherapy Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 1994 May;31(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90398-0.

DOI:10.1016/0167-8140(94)90398-0
PMID:8066197
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse whether the intended patient setup, based on a CT scan, was different from the setup at the simulator. Furthermore, we investigated how these possible transfer errors between the planned patient setup and the actual simulator setup affected the resulting overall treatment setup accuracy. Two groups, of 15 prostate patients each, were studied. For one group (group II), the simulation time was about twice as large as for the other (group I), since digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were used to get a good visual agreement between the intended and the simulator setup. For the purpose of this study DRRs were also calculated for the patients in group I, and for both groups DRRs were matched with the simulator images to obtain quantitative data of the transfer errors. The resulting overall treatment setup accuracy was determined by comparing the DRRs with portal images. For group I, the standard deviations (SD) of the differences between the DRRs and the simulator images ('transfer errors') were 1.5 mm and 4.5 mm in the lateral (x) and cranio-caudal (y) direction, respectively. For group II the SDs were smaller: 1.4 mm and 1.5 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.3 mm. For group I, the SDs of the resulting overall setup deviations during treatment were 1.6 mm and 4.1 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For group II, these figures were 2.4 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.0 mm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是分析基于CT扫描的预期患者摆位是否与模拟机上的摆位不同。此外,我们还研究了计划患者摆位与实际模拟机摆位之间这些可能的转移误差如何影响最终的整体治疗摆位精度。对两组各15例前列腺癌患者进行了研究。对于一组(第二组),模拟时间约为另一组(第一组)的两倍,因为使用数字重建射线照片(DRR)以在预期摆位和模拟机摆位之间获得良好的视觉一致性。为了本研究的目的,也为第一组患者计算了DRR,并且将两组的DRR与模拟机图像匹配以获得转移误差的定量数据。通过将DRR与射野图像进行比较来确定最终的整体治疗摆位精度。对于第一组,DRR与模拟机图像之间差异(“转移误差”)的标准差(SD)在横向(x)和头脚方向(y)上分别为1.5mm和4.5mm。对于第二组,SD较小:在x和y方向上分别为1.4mm和1.5mm。对于两组,总体平均值的幅度均小于1.3mm。对于第一组,治疗期间最终整体摆位偏差的SD在x和y方向上分别为1.6mm和4.1mm。对于第二组,这些数字分别为2.4mm和2.6mm。对于两组,总体平均值的幅度均小于1.0mm。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Transfer errors of planning CT to simulator: a possible source of setup inaccuracies?计划CT到模拟定位机的转移误差:设置不准确的一个可能来源?
Radiother Oncol. 1994 May;31(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90398-0.
2
Can digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRS) replace simulation films in prostate cancer conformal radiotherapy?在前列腺癌适形放疗中,数字重建X线片(DRRS)能否取代模拟定位片?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 15;57(4):1122-30. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)01379-8.
3
Analysis and reduction of 3D systematic and random setup errors during the simulation and treatment of lung cancer patients with CT-based external beam radiotherapy dose planning.基于CT的外照射放疗剂量规划对肺癌患者进行模拟和治疗期间3D系统和随机摆位误差的分析与减少
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):857-68. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01413-9.
4
Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR).使用CT模拟和数字重建射线照片(DRR)对肺癌患者进行高精度设置验证和校正的程序。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 1;55(3):804-10. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04285-2.
5
Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.用于前列腺癌根治性剂量递增放疗的门静脉成像方案。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 1;40(1):221-31. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00551-8.
6
Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data.利用射野图像、模拟定位机图像和计算机断层扫描数据对放射治疗中的患者摆位进行自动三维检查。
Med Phys. 1996 Mar;23(3):389-99. doi: 10.1118/1.597801.
7
Simulation of 3D-treatment plans in head and neck tumors aided by matching of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and on-line distortion corrected simulator images.通过数字重建射线照片(DRR)与在线畸变校正模拟器图像匹配辅助的头颈部肿瘤三维治疗计划模拟。
Radiother Oncol. 1997 Nov;45(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00111-4.
8
Magnetic resonance-based treatment planning for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy: creation of digitally reconstructed radiographs.基于磁共振成像的前列腺调强放射治疗计划:数字重建X线片的创建
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.033.
9
Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images.基于磁共振成像(MRI)的参考图像用于盆腔图像引导放射治疗(采用锥形束计算机断层扫描或平面定位图像)的可行性。
Acta Oncol. 2015 Jun;54(6):889-95. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.958197. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
10
Improved human observer performance in digital reconstructed radiograph verification in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.头颈部癌放疗中数字重建射线照相验证中人类观察者性能的改善。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Oct;10(10):1667-73. doi: 10.1007/s11548-014-1127-4. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A simple method to test the geometrical reliability of digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR).一种测试数字重建放射影像(DRR)几何可靠性的简单方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Jan 29;11(1):3128. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3128.
2
Impact of geometric uncertainties on dose distribution during intensity modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer: the need for a planning target volume and a planning organ-at-risk volume.头颈部癌症调强放疗中几何不确定性对剂量分布的影响:计划靶区和计划危及器官体积的必要性。
Curr Oncol. 2006 Jun;13(3):108-15. doi: 10.3390/curroncol13030010.