Bel A, Bartelink H, Vijlbrief R E, Lebesque J V
Radiotherapy Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Amsterdam.
Radiother Oncol. 1994 May;31(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90398-0.
The purpose of this study was to analyse whether the intended patient setup, based on a CT scan, was different from the setup at the simulator. Furthermore, we investigated how these possible transfer errors between the planned patient setup and the actual simulator setup affected the resulting overall treatment setup accuracy. Two groups, of 15 prostate patients each, were studied. For one group (group II), the simulation time was about twice as large as for the other (group I), since digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were used to get a good visual agreement between the intended and the simulator setup. For the purpose of this study DRRs were also calculated for the patients in group I, and for both groups DRRs were matched with the simulator images to obtain quantitative data of the transfer errors. The resulting overall treatment setup accuracy was determined by comparing the DRRs with portal images. For group I, the standard deviations (SD) of the differences between the DRRs and the simulator images ('transfer errors') were 1.5 mm and 4.5 mm in the lateral (x) and cranio-caudal (y) direction, respectively. For group II the SDs were smaller: 1.4 mm and 1.5 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.3 mm. For group I, the SDs of the resulting overall setup deviations during treatment were 1.6 mm and 4.1 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For group II, these figures were 2.4 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.0 mm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是分析基于CT扫描的预期患者摆位是否与模拟机上的摆位不同。此外,我们还研究了计划患者摆位与实际模拟机摆位之间这些可能的转移误差如何影响最终的整体治疗摆位精度。对两组各15例前列腺癌患者进行了研究。对于一组(第二组),模拟时间约为另一组(第一组)的两倍,因为使用数字重建射线照片(DRR)以在预期摆位和模拟机摆位之间获得良好的视觉一致性。为了本研究的目的,也为第一组患者计算了DRR,并且将两组的DRR与模拟机图像匹配以获得转移误差的定量数据。通过将DRR与射野图像进行比较来确定最终的整体治疗摆位精度。对于第一组,DRR与模拟机图像之间差异(“转移误差”)的标准差(SD)在横向(x)和头脚方向(y)上分别为1.5mm和4.5mm。对于第二组,SD较小:在x和y方向上分别为1.4mm和1.5mm。对于两组,总体平均值的幅度均小于1.3mm。对于第一组,治疗期间最终整体摆位偏差的SD在x和y方向上分别为1.6mm和4.1mm。对于第二组,这些数字分别为2.4mm和2.6mm。对于两组,总体平均值的幅度均小于1.0mm。(摘要截断于250字)