Boot S, LaRoche N, Legg E F
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, East Birmingham Hospital, Bordesley Green, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1994 May;31 ( Pt 3):262-6. doi: 10.1177/000456329403100308.
The aim of this study was to find a method for creatinine analysis unaffected by jaundice by comparing four different methods with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as a reference method. The methods investigated were Kodak DTSC single slide, Boehringer alkaline picrate with and without blank correction and a Boehringer enzymatic method, the last three using the Hitachi 737 analyser. HPLC results were compared with the results of the methods studied. In addition, graphs plotting the difference from the HPLC result against the bilirubin concentration were made; the ideal method would yield a slope and intercept of zero. While all methods showed a positive bias compared with HPLC, the Kodak slide and the Boehringer alkaline picrate with blank correction methods eliminated bilirubin interference and we have changed to the latter method as a consequence of this work.
本研究的目的是通过将四种不同方法与作为参考方法的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)进行比较,找到一种不受黄疸影响的肌酐分析方法。所研究的方法有柯达DTSC单张玻片法、有和没有空白校正的勃林格碱性苦味酸盐法以及勃林格酶法,后三种方法使用日立737分析仪。将HPLC结果与所研究方法的结果进行比较。此外,绘制了与HPLC结果的差异相对于胆红素浓度的图表;理想的方法应产生斜率和截距均为零的结果。虽然与HPLC相比,所有方法均显示出正偏差,但柯达玻片法和有空白校正的勃林格碱性苦味酸盐法消除了胆红素干扰,因此我们已改用后一种方法。