• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者自控镇痛药物过量的识别:一种监测不良事件的计算机化方法。

Identification of patient-controlled analgesia overdoses in hospitalized patients: a computerized method of monitoring adverse events.

作者信息

Whipple J K, Quebbeman E J, Lewis K S, Gaughan L M, Gallup E L, Ausman R K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 1994 May;28(5):655-8. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800517.

DOI:10.1177/106002809402800517
PMID:8069006
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and validate a computer-based quality assurance method that detects narcotic overdoses associated with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use.

SETTING

Two acute care teaching hospitals.

PATIENTS

4669 patients who received PCA.

INTERVENTIONS

The following patient lists were obtained during a two-year period from both hospital information systems: those who received PCA and (1) received naloxone, a narcotic antagonist, (2) were transferred to an intensive care unit, (3) had a cardiac or respiratory arrest, or (4) died. Possible overdoses were defined as patients who appeared on the PCA list and one of the other lists. Charts were reviewed if the patient's name appeared on the PCA and one of the other lists. Patients were judged to have experienced a narcotic overdose if there was an immediate improvement in blood pressure, respiratory rate, or mental status after the administration of naloxone.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 294 possible overdoses in 1499 patients who received PCA. Ten charts were unavailable for review. An actual overdose occurred in 11 patients. The accuracy of the new method was compared with that of the hospitals' present reporting methods. Eleven overdoses were identified by the computer search, but only 6 overdoses were identified in incident and adverse drug reaction reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic computer search identified almost twice as many adverse incidents than were reported by the traditional hospital methods.

摘要

目的

描述并验证一种基于计算机的质量保证方法,该方法可检测与患者自控镇痛(PCA)使用相关的麻醉剂过量情况。

设置

两家急症护理教学医院。

患者

4669例接受PCA的患者。

干预措施

在两年期间从两家医院信息系统获取以下患者名单:接受PCA且(1)接受了麻醉拮抗剂纳洛酮、(2)被转入重症监护病房、(3)发生心脏或呼吸骤停或(4)死亡的患者。可能的过量用药定义为出现在PCA名单以及其他名单之一上的患者。如果患者姓名出现在PCA名单和其他名单之一上,则对病历进行审查。如果给予纳洛酮后血压、呼吸频率或精神状态立即改善,则判断患者发生了麻醉剂过量。

结果

搜索策略在1499例接受PCA的患者中识别出294例可能的过量用药情况。10份病历无法进行审查。11例患者发生了实际的过量用药。将新方法的准确性与医院现有的报告方法进行了比较。计算机搜索识别出11例过量用药情况,但事件报告和药物不良反应报告中仅识别出6例过量用药情况。

结论

系统的计算机搜索识别出的不良事件几乎是传统医院方法报告数量的两倍。

相似文献

1
Identification of patient-controlled analgesia overdoses in hospitalized patients: a computerized method of monitoring adverse events.住院患者自控镇痛药物过量的识别:一种监测不良事件的计算机化方法。
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 May;28(5):655-8. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800517.
2
Narcotic use in the hospital: reasonably safe?医院中的麻醉药物使用:相对安全吗?
Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):897-901. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600705.
3
Difficulties in diagnosing narcotic overdoses in hospitalized patients.住院患者麻醉药品过量诊断的困难。
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Apr;28(4):446-50. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800403.
4
The prevalence of and risk factors for adverse events in children receiving patient-controlled analgesia by proxy or patient-controlled analgesia after surgery.接受代理自控镇痛或术后自控镇痛的儿童不良事件的发生率及危险因素。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):70-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172fa9e.
5
Naloxone in cardiac arrest with suspected opioid overdoses.纳洛酮治疗疑似阿片类药物过量引起的心脏骤停。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jan;81(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.016. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
6
Analysis of benzonatate overdoses among adults and children from 1969-2010 by the United States Food and Drug Administration.1969 年至 2010 年美国食品药品监督管理局对成人和儿童苯佐那酯用药过量的分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jan;33(1):38-43. doi: 10.1002/phar.1153.
7
Overdose training and take-home naloxone for opiate users: prospective cohort study of impact on knowledge and attitudes and subsequent management of overdoses.为阿片类药物使用者提供过量用药培训及纳洛酮带回家:关于对知识、态度及后续过量用药管理影响的前瞻性队列研究
Addiction. 2008 Oct;103(10):1648-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02314.x.
8
Respiratory-related critical events with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.静脉自控镇痛相关的呼吸危急事件。
Clin J Pain. 1994 Mar;10(1):52-6. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199403000-00007.
9
Prospective comparative assessment of buprenorphine overdose with heroin and methadone: clinical characteristics and response to antidotal treatment.前瞻性比较评估丁丙诺啡与海洛因和美沙酮过量:临床特征和解毒治疗反应。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):403-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
10
A national survey of American Pediatric Anesthesiologists: patient-controlled analgesia and other intravenous opioid therapies in pediatric acute pain management.一项针对美国儿科麻醉医师的全国性调查:小儿急性疼痛管理中的患者自控镇痛和其他静脉内阿片类药物治疗。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):754-60. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ca749c.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical malpractice in Iran: A systematic review.伊朗的医疗事故:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Oct 14;33:110. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.110. eCollection 2019.
2
Effectiveness of interventions on the appropriate use of opioids for noncancer pain among hospital inpatients: A systematic review.住院患者中针对非癌性疼痛合理使用阿片类药物的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;86(2):210-243. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14203. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Detection of medication-related problems in hospital practice: a review.
医院实践中药物相关问题的检测:综述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;76(1):7-20. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12049.
4
Understanding and preventing wrong-patient electronic orders: a randomized controlled trial.理解和预防电子医嘱错误:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):305-10. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001055. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.系统评价评估电子药物不良事件检测的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000454.
6
Detecting adverse events using information technology.利用信息技术检测不良事件。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):115-28. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1074.
7
Adverse drug events related to dosage forms and delivery systems.与剂型和给药系统相关的药物不良事件。
Drug Saf. 1996 Jan;14(1):39-67. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614010-00005.